Kai T. Ericson, born in Vienna in 1931, is considered by many
an authority on the catastrophic events and their social fallouts. This American
sociologist studied plethora of disasters, among them the disaster created by
the US nuclear testing. What Kai explains is that, unfortunately, this particular disaster
never had an ending.
Answer:
Trump was making false allegations saying that Biden had cheated in the election which cause his supporters to believe his lie
Explanation:
saying that Biden had cheated in the election which cause his supporters to believe his lie, he also encouraged to come and make it happen he kept enforcing it which the people believe that they were doing the right thing the day before it on January 5th he encouraged them even more by saying we going to win we going to crush them you guys have to come and more nonsense he even said he will be there to support them the day it happen he congratulate them from their actions which made them think they were doing the right thing also a few of people died from it
Papua New Guinea is the largest island of the more densely populated southwestern Oceanic island group. It is located north of Australia and to the east of Indonesia.
Answer:
In addition to the drain of silver, by 1838 the number of Chinese opium addicts had grown to between four and 12 million and the Daoguang Emperor demanded action. Officials at the court who advocated legalizing and taxing the trade were defeated by those who advocated suppressing it. The Emperor sent the leader of the hard line faction, Special Imperial Commissioner Lin Zexu, to Canton, where he quickly arrested Chinese opium dealers and summarily demanded that foreign firms turn over their stocks with no compensation. When they refused, Lin stopped trade altogether and placed the foreign residents under virtual siege in their factories. The British Superintendent of Trade in China Charles Elliot got the British traders to agree to hand over their opium stock with the promise of eventual compensation for their loss from the British government. While this amounted to a tacit acknowledgment that the British government did not disapprove of the trade, it also placed a huge liability on the exchequer. This promise and the inability of the British government to pay it without causing a political storm was an important casus belli for the subsequent British offensive.
