1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
2 years ago
12

California has been referred to as "the ungovernable state". Several governors have attempted to effectively govern the state in

conjunction with the state legislature and courts. From the lecture summary, mention some examples of governors struggling with this "ungovernability".
Law
1 answer:
Neko [114]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The California Republic is a western state of the United State. It shares its border with Mexico along the ocean, Pacific. In 2009, California is declared all over the media and the public as the "ungovernable state". They claimed that the Governors were not able to govern the state properly in conjunction to the legislature and the courts of the state. Decentring is used to remark the governance of the state that the governors have a dominion on the rule and that the directives are happening within the communal factors.

Some of the possible reasons are :

1. Proposition 13 : The effect of the proposition 13, the property tax limit measures that was passed in the year 1978 is the part of damage the initiative did to California.

2.Budget Initiative

3. Gerrymandering

4. Terms limit

5. Two thirds votes of the legislature to pass a budget.

6. Boom and the bust taxation.

You might be interested in
In which of the following ways do utilitarians and Aristotle stand united against Rawls’s liberalism? a) Utilitarians and Aristo
jekas [21]

Answer:

b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Explanation:

Utilitarians believe that the interest of government should be the same as that of the people, the reason is that, as a whole, the greatest liberty of people is a function of the welfare the people wish to enjoy, and this eads to the possibility and the desirability of progressive social change through peaceful political processes.

At the same time, Aristotle believe that government should govern for the general good or interest of the people, he concluded that, a kind of constitutional democracy, is the most ideal, as it sought for general interest of the people, in which rich and poor respect each other’s rights and the best-qualified citizens rule with the consent of all.

On the contrary, Rawls Liberalism believe that government should only uphold what is ideal, by balancing what is right with justice. According to him, government should protect the citizens, but not necessarily giving in to the aggregate pleasure of the people, that is, doing what is right, which will be supported by reasonable people as against what is considered good.

Hence, Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

5 0
3 years ago
if a cop proceeds to pull me over for going over the speed limit and ask “Sir, do you know how fast you were going”, do i then h
nirvana33 [79]
I would reply with “no sir how fast was I going” so that it can not be used against you in court you have to remember anything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law in court you would want to ask for what proof he has that you were speeding
6 0
3 years ago
The power of the Supreme Court to hear cases that have NOT been tried and ruled on in lower courts is called:
sweet [91]

Answer:

original jurisdiction

5 0
3 years ago
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
3 years ago
After your case is reviewed by the District Court of Appeals and they determine not to
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

I don't know sorry......

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following theorists argued that an individual’s personality is based on the id, the ego, and the superego?
    5·1 answer
  • How does our Governor plan to close the achievement gap in education?
    14·2 answers
  • Entrepreneurs need to know the basics of accounting even if they hire a professional because
    7·2 answers
  • Which debates do you think are more valuable to voters?
    13·1 answer
  • Me ayudan porfavor!!
    10·1 answer
  • From the driver's point of view, the driver is watching a boy walk through a crosswalk on the street where the driver wants to m
    6·1 answer
  • Jordan files for bankruptcy because he has debts of $1 million that he cannot pay. He would like to sign a document to assure hi
    8·2 answers
  • Nhà nước Cộng hoà xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam không mang bản chất tính giai cấp đúng hay sai
    6·1 answer
  • My uncle chocked, and my aunt asked her child who was in the room and he and his child denied it. I am so upset because they don
    6·1 answer
  • 5. And if these laws have been made they have to be enforced by a body called executive, and when these laws are broken or disob
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!