1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luda [366]
3 years ago
11

OK MY LAS QUESTION I NEED AN LEGIT ANSWER PLS

History
2 answers:
Amiraneli [1.4K]3 years ago
8 0
Answer

In 538 BCE King Cyrus made a public declaration granting the Jews the right to return to Judah and rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. In the year 586 BCE, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylonia conquered the city of Jerusalem, destroyed the Temple and sent many of the inhabitants of Judah into exile

hope this helps and have a wonderful day :)
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The reason why is the jews have serious large amount of waves.

Explanation:

according to this  in 538 B.C E ( Before Christ Era) thousand of groups  began to return of the land by big amount of waves through thousands of years  (i really hope this helps :)) )

You might be interested in
What was the result when US troops fought Field Marshall Rommel’s Afrika Korps in the Battle of Kasserine Pass?
Lina20 [59]
The result when United States troops fought Field Marshall Rommel's Afrika Korps in the Battle of Kasserine Pass, <span>US forces were forced to retreat by German troops. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the result of the issue from the election of 1800?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

"The 1800 election result revealed a serious flaw in the U.S. Constitution, which said that candidates for president and vice president ran on the same ballot, which meant running mates could be running against each other. The 12th Amendment, which changed the Constitution to prevent the 1800 election problem from recurring..."

Explanation:

The Controversial Election of Thomas Jefferson in 1800

6 0
3 years ago
Qhy does one party rule matter to totalitarian states
12345 [234]

The totalitarian states usually don't allow any opposition parties to exist. If some people try to form a party, they usually end up in prison, are banished from the nation, or even murdered.

The reason why the totalitarian rulers prefer a one party system is in order to have all the power in the country, without having opposition that will constantly go public about the terrors and injustices that are happening. If there are more parties, than the people will start to support them, especially cause rarely who likes to live under a totalitarian ruler, thus the totalitarian ruler will face a situation where he/she will lose its power.

3 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the regional cultures and economies of the English, French, and Spanish areas of control in the Americas. H
Dennis_Churaev [7]
  • British Colonies in the Americas were established by royal charter. French colonies started as fur trading posts and then developed later to common colonies. Spanish colonies were crown-sponsored conquests to find riches such as gold and silver.
  • The British colonies had population mostly from colonists that were recruited among middle-class farmers, servants, and convicted criminals. French colonies population were initially traders, merchants and missionaries, later some soldiers were given land there. Spanish colonies population consisted of conquerors, soldiers and missionaries.
  • The economy from each colony was different, in the British colony the economy was diverse and included mostly farming, fishing and trading products like tobacco, rice, timber, and fish. The French colony economy like said before, was established over fur trade and some plantations on the Mississippi valley. The Spanish colonies economy was a trading economy that consisted of farming but it was heavily regulated by the Spanish crown.
  • The British colony started with a friendly relationship with the Native Americans, eventually, things changed when they needed to get new land. The French colony relationship with Native Americans was good, they respected them and forged alliances. Spanish colony relationship with Native Americans was bad when they were not killed by soldiers, they were subjugated or converted to Christianity.

5 0
3 years ago
Cause
coldgirl [10]
The answer could probably be c
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What can you do to avoid being exploited by sensationalists?
    12·1 answer
  • I called for an Africa for the Africans, at home and abroad. I wanted people to take pride in their African heritage and wrote T
    12·2 answers
  • What was one positive outcome of the major disaster at the battle of Camden?
    5·1 answer
  • Elizabeth of England was one of Europe 's most famous monarchs in the second half of the sixteenth century. Discuss her method o
    14·1 answer
  • Can I please please please have help?
    5·1 answer
  • The culture of Libya and the Maghreb is a blend of _____, European, and Asian influences.
    6·2 answers
  • True or False: The colonists don't have a regular army. They have a poorly trained militia.
    5·2 answers
  • **GIVING BRAINLIEST 11 POINTS!!**
    5·2 answers
  • How did the French and Indian War cause tension between the British and the colonists?
    15·1 answer
  • President Johnson believed that one of the best ways to end poverty was through:
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!