This is a condition having tail in a crack.
Explanation:
In the given question, the scenario is that there is a legal restriction, called as entailment, with the Cunningham family, while selling a piece of their land for the purpose of gaining money or profit. According to the legal term, entailment, the owner of the land or house is unable to sell it for profit. The property can only be transferred to the other member of the family.
So now it is a logical example that having a tail in the crack. It means that when tail of an animal is stuck in a crack, that animal is unable to move. So this example best illustrates the situation of the Cunningham Family, as they are facing the entailment, and stuck with the land which they own and which they cannot sell for profit. They do not have any other choice than staying with the land, which means their tail is stuck in the crack.
Learn more about entailment at:
brainly.com/question/13568955
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
foreign exchange risk: Alpha Ltd. has taken a loan for increasing its production and sales, but it has not conducted any research before making decision.
Answer: A) depends on the rods
Explanation:
Rods are the components that helps in providing vision in dim or low amount of light.Rods provides the ability to see objects around us at night but does not provide facility of color vision because of light sensitivity.
According to the question,Jane is able to see things due to the peripheral vision provided by the rods in night time but isn't able to identify the colors.
Other options are incorrect because cones, pupil and retina are not the factors that provide low-light vision to people.Thus, the correct option is option(A).
Despite wide recognition that speculation is critical for successful science, philosophers have attended little to it. When they have, speculation has been characterized in narrowly epistemic terms: a hypothesis is speculative due to its (lack of) evidential support. These ‘evidence-first’ accounts provide little guidance for what makes speculation productive or egregious, nor how to foster the former while avoiding the latter. I examine how scientists discuss speculation and identify various functions speculations play. On this basis, I develop a ‘function-first’ account of speculation. This analysis grounds a richer discussion of when speculation is egregious and when it is productive, based in both fine-grained analysis of the speculation’s purpose, and what I call the ‘epistemic situation’ scientists face.
