The system of checks and balances help protect our rights because if congress decided they want to pass a law, the president has to okay the bill. If the president thinks its taking rights away he can veto or pocket-veto the bill. Another example is that the president can move troops wherever he wants military wise, but can't declare war. Only congress can declare war. But in retrospect, the power is divided so that one group in the government has to much power over people and over other government politics.<span />
A belief that the Soviets intended to spread communism throughout the world
Honestly i dont know i am doing this for teh points
Marcus Garvey was a descent of Jamaican, a leader of the Pan-Africanism movement and founder of Universal Negro Improvement Association.
Marcus Garvey was a Black-American which sought to unify and connect the people of African descent worldwide.
He was very popular for organizing the U.S. first Black nationalist movement after the WWI where he advised the blacks to be proud of their identity.
Therefore, Option C is correct because he promoted black cultural pride and economic independence.
Learn more about Marcus Garvey here
brainly.com/question/4421138
Answer:
The Arizona v. United States decision struck down all Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration.
Explanation:
Federalism is a form of government that stands in direct opposition to the notion of centralism, that is, to the form of political organization of states in which power appears centralized in the hands of a single governing group. Federalism, for its part, allows power (and the freedom to make decisions) to be distributed independently to the federal, state, and local government.
Under federalism, the rules governing immigration matters are different for the federal government, the state government, and the place where one can set their own guidelines for this. With regard to immigration, we can say that since the 1990s, states have increasingly adopted the political domain of immigration, and state involvement in immigration is partly due to their interest in preventing illegal immigrants from accessing public services, as educational and welfare benefits. In addition, we can state that federal immigration laws outperform state laws.
False information about immigration federalism is: "Arizona's decision against the United States overturned all of Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration."