Answer:
Correct answer is They didn't want any more involvement in other countries' troubles.
Explanation:
First option is not correct as Wilson was respected as president and finished his second term in 1921.
Second option is not correct as this type of thinking was never stressed out.
Third option is correct as they believed that involvement in other countries problems could only bring them problems.
Last option is not correct as United States actually believed that Peace of Versailles was in some parts too harsh.
Judicial restraint is a position that judges adopt when they purposely limit the exercise of their power. Judicial restraint judges make a cautious approach of their interpretation of laws, normally taking a very conservative position, instead of making decisions that could be considered as controversial. Judicial restraint is the opposite of judicial activism.
For example, a judicial restraint judge is in charge of sentencing a criminal for attempting to rob a bank. He or she revises previous cases and will probably make a sentence of similar proportions to the criminal, basing his or her decision on past sentences.
What are you talking about???
Answer:
The correct approach will be "driving out non-Christian groups".
Explanation:
- Through general control via Madrid, channeled by a governor throughout Lisbon, Spain entrusted the governance of Portugal as well as its kingdom essentially to something like the Portuguese community.
- Among the many approaches, Spain decided to normalize relations would have been to force away non-Christian forces who occupied several other lands as well as keep the land who granted the rights of the nobles.