Cual de las siguientes afirmaciones concuerda mejor con las circunstancias de filiberto
<h3>Escribe en el futuro y el condicional perfecto.</h3><h3>Write in the perfect future and the perfect conditional.</h3>
<em>1.</em><em> (llegar) / ellos </em>
<em>Answer 1: </em><em>Ellos </em><u><em>habrán llegado</em></u><em>. Ellos </em><u><em>habrían llegado</em></u><em>. </em>
Translation 1: They will have arrived. They would have arrived.
<em>2.</em><em> No / (terminar) /nosotros </em>
<em>Answer 2: </em><em>Nosotros </em><u><em>no habremos terminado</em></u><em>. Nosotros </em><u><em>no habríamos terminado. </em></u>
Translation 2: We will not have finished. We would not have finished.
<em>3.</em><em> No lo / (hacer) /tu </em>
<em>Answer 3: </em><em>Tú </em><u><em>no lo habrás hecho</em></u><em>. Tú </em><u><em>no lo habrías hecho</em></u><em>. </em>
Translation 3: You will not have done it. You wouldn't have done it.
<em>4.</em><em> (ir) / Sandra </em>
<em>Answer 4: </em><em>Sandra </em><u><em>habrá ido</em></u><em>. Sandra </em><u><em>habría ido</em></u><em>. </em>
Translation 4: Sandra will have gone. Sandra would have gone.
<h2><em>Spymore</em></h2>
HI!
the frist is
Mi vecino me oyo gritando socorro
y la segunda es
Yo cocine un pollo por tres horas y lo queme
The correct answer is letter A, proteger el medio ambiente.
Answer:
Translation of what you asked:
Conclution
of corruption in Ecuador.
My A: go to www.hrw.org
Explanation:
