Answer:
A year after the Oklahoma Land Rush, the director of the U.S. Census Bureau announced that the frontier was closed. The 1890 census had shown that a frontier line, a point beyond which the population density was less than two persons per square mile, no longer existed.
Explanation:
C. separation of powers. The 3 branches of government are executive, judicial, and legislative. Each branch has their own separate duties and cannot do tasks that belong to a different branch. Separation of powers also refers to each branch checking each others decisions to keep one from being more powerful or controlling than the rest.
I would send some good workers, and lumberjacks or blacksmiths. I would bring axes, guns, and a lot of weaponry in the case that we might meet an unfriendly people. I would make sure to bring cloth, and a lot of men for working, lifting and building, Maybe some craftsmen and women who sew too. (We need clothes)
Okay I would bring plant seeds, gardeners, spades, and a lot of growing utensils. I would try to find a place with good soil, a water source, and a lot of trees. We would cut down the trees, and make houses, then start gardening and planting our food. Some of us would have to hunt while we wait for the plants to grow. Meat for everyone!! I would use a republican government and allow the people to vote on their on for the president!
Hope this helps...!
Answer:
A month after the Democratic conference, Senator Carter Glass of Virginia, a. Democratic leader who received 78 votes for the presidential nomination in 1924, reasserted in his speech of April 5 at Asheville that “prohibition is not a party issue.” The speech was of interest both for its comments on the candidacy of Governor Smith of New York and as a disclosure of the reasoning that prevailed in the Democratic conference.
“Prohibition was not passed by the Democrats or by the Republicans,” Senator Glass said, “but by men of both parties and with no regard for party lines. It was a moral issue, So why in heaven's name should the Democrats make the eighteenth amendment a party issue in the next national campaign, as though electing a wet President would affect the prohibition law? If they do they might just as well take the presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter…They might just as well take their party out and dump it on the scrap heap.”If the Democratic party nominated Governor Smith as “an avowed exponent of the movement to repeal or modify the eighteenth amendment” or should it make prohibition an issue by platform declaration, Senator Glass said, the Democratic candidate would be “badly beaten” and the party “irretrievably wrecked.” He explained at the same time that “the presidency means nothing in the fight for modification,” that the President could not change the Constitution, and that his influence with Congress on such an issue “would be negligible,” In view of these facts Senator Glass believed the modification issue had no place in a presidential platform or a presidential campaign.
Explanation:
Here is just some information to get you started. I copied this off the web, so you cannot use it as direct writing, because that would be copy-right.
I promise you this is not a scam, but the rest of the information or the website I got the information from is linked below.
https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1927042300
The refrigerator car I believe.<span />
