Answer:
Question 1: Does an art object have to serve a function to be art?
This type of question needs an answer from the one reading the question. However, I feel that an art object doesn't have to serve a function to be art. because art should speak for itself.
Question 2: Are art objects valuable in themselves, without any functions?
Art objects need to operate in some way all art exists for a cause and these motivations make up the functions of art.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, L.E.
I think it’s A :) hope this helps!
I think it's a <span>young man returning to his beloved</span>
Romeo finds out about the party, and romeo is invited by the servant if he is not a Montague
