Answer:
In employment law, a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) (US) or bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) (Canada) or genuine occupational qualification (GOQ) (UK) is a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when making decisions on the hiring and retention of employees—a quality that when considered in other contexts would constitute discrimination and thus be in violation of civil rights employment law. Such qualifications must be listed in the employment offering.[citation needed]
Explanation:
Canada
The law of Canada regarding bona fide occupational requirements was considered in a 1985 Canadian court case involving an employee of the Canadian National Railway, K. S. Bhinder, a Sikh whose religion required that he wear a turban, lost his challenge of the CNR policy that required him to wear a hard hat.[1] In 1990, in deciding another case, the Supreme Court of Canada amended the Bhinder decision: "An employer that has not adopted a policy with respect to accommodation and cannot otherwise satisfy the trier of fact that individual accommodation would result in undue hardship will be required to justify his conduct with respect to the individual complainant. Even then the employer can invoke the BFOQ defence."[2]
United States
In employment discrimination law in the United States, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contain a BFOQ defense. The BFOQ provision of Title VII provides that:
[I]t shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise ...[3]
i'm not able to add the balance of the answer so pls go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide_occupational_qualification
A small start-up is a good fit for Alex.
Startups are frequently internet- or technology-based firms with broad market appeal. On the other hand, you don't need a sizable market to expand into in order to run a small firm. All you need is a market, and you must be able to effectively contact and service every member of that market.
Despite their tiny size, startups can have a big impact on the expansion of the economy. Startups are the epicenters of the invention; they generate jobs, which increases employment and boosts the economy; and they have a noticeable influence on the cities in which they settle.
After a few years of operation, startups are on the road to success. While small firms develop quickly, they can only do so if they start to see success over time. A startup needs time to develop and gain a large customer base that can use its product.
Types of startups are:
- Buyable startups
- Scalable startups
- Offshoot startups
- Social startups
To know more about startups refer to: brainly.com/question/14488761
#SPJ1
Answer:
The journal entries for all transactions are as follows;
Explanation:
June 8. Bad Debts Expense Dr.$8,440
Accounts-Receivable-Kathy Quantel Cr.$8,440
Aug 14. Bank Dr.$3,000
Bad Debt Expense Dr. $9,500
Accounts Receivable-Rosalie Oakes Cr.$12,500
Oct 16. Accounts-Receivable-Kathy Quantel Dr.$8,440
Bad Debts Expense Cr. $ 8,440
Cash Dr. $8,440
Accounts-Receivable-Kathy Quantel Cr.$8,440
Dec 31. Bad debt Expense Dr. 24,955
Account Receivable-Wade Dolan Cr.$4,600
A/R-Greg Gagne Cr.$3,600
A/R-Amber Kisko Cr.$7,150
A/R- Shannon Poole Cr.$2,975
A/R-Niki Spence Cr.$6,630
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
When nobody wants the product, the product builds up until there is so much the product becomes cheaper. This is because the product is not scarce anymore.
Answer:
U.S. dollars = 14.012 U.S. dollars
Explanation:
Below is the exchange rate:
0.92777 Canadian dollars = 1 U.S dollars
Thus to find the amount of U.S. dollars bought from the 13 Canadian dollars, just divide the 13 Canadian dollars from 0.92777. Therefore the resulting answer will be the U.S. dollars.
U.S. dollars = 13 / 0.92777
U.S. dollars = 14.012 U.S. dollars