What led to the demise of the Karankawa people: Was as a result of the various illicit activity they engage in such as robbery.
<h3>
The people of karankawa</h3>
The Karankawa population continue to declines as a result of disease and the karankawa involved themselves in robbery which was why they were removed from Texas.
Before their demise they had conflict with Europeans and
Juan Cortina was the person that attacked the last people of Karankawa which eventually led to the total demise of the people of karankawa.
Therefore What led to the demise of the Karankawa people: Was as a result of the various activity they engage in such as robbery.
Learn more about people of karankawa here:brainly.com/question/18202954
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation: Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca introduced the wealth and power of Mali to the rest of the Mediterranean. ... The king had carried 30,000 pounds of gold, which signified the immense wealth in his empire. This created an impression on his acquaintances. Hope this helps... :D
The Norman conquest of England was the 11th-century invasion and occupation of England by an army of Norman, Breton, and French soldiers led by Duke William II of Normandy, later styled William the Conqueror.Start date: 1066
The meaning of Fisher Ames' description of democracy's liberty as licentiousness refers to <u>the potential danger that </u><u>unlimited freedom</u><u> can inflict on a democracy</u>.
Fisher Ames warned that immorality would erupt in democracy, thereby destroying its gains because of the excessive permissions.
Thus, the meaning of Fisher Ames' description of democracy's liberty as licentiousness is<u> to warn against excessive behaviors</u>.
Learn more about the characteristics of democracy here: brainly.com/question/8157957
Answer:
The correct approach is Option C (The Avars............Slavs).
Explanation:
- The Byzantine kingdom or Empire, the eastern portion including its Roman Empire, that further lasted for something like a thousand decades of its existence including its western half across numerous feudal territories, gradually collapsed throughout 1453 against Ottoman Turkish assaults.
- During most of the wars against both the Slavs, these Avars remained allies including its Byzantines, being much more important for the success including its Byzantines as well as the expansion including its empire, because after the transition of authorities and even in the middle of an economic downturn, they turned against any Byzantines as well as receive very large fees that led to the downfall including its empire.
All the other three methods mentioned just aren't connected to the situation given. So, option C therefore the right one.
