Hello. This question was incomplete. The full question is:
Now let's look at the win-loss percentage between the 7–7 wrestlers and the 8–6 wrestlers the next time they meet, when neither one is on the bubble. In this case, there is no great pressure on the individual match. So you might expect the wrestlers who won their 7–7 matches in the previous tournament to do about as well as they had in earlier matches against these same opponents—that is, winning roughly 50 percent of the time. You certainly wouldn't expect them to uphold their 80 percent clip.
As it turns out, the data show that the 7-7 wrestlers win only 40 percent of the rematches. Eighty percent in one match and 40 percent in the next? How do you make sense of that?
Which type of evidence does the authors use in this excerpt to support the claim that some sumo wrestlers will intentionally lose a match?
Answer:
statistical
Explanation:
The authors use statistical data showing percentages and numbers that support and support the information given in the text above. These statistical data, in addition to confirming the arguments and statements presented, are credible to the article, as it shows that a survey was carried out and that there was accurate data collection, so that the statistics could be completed. In this way, the statistic presents very specific and accurate evidence for the text.
I would say the third option because a short story shouldn’t have crazy twists and surprises when it is supposed to be short. Sorry if I’m wrong tho :)
A. to restate the main idea by summarizing the supporting details
Answer:
It seems you have everything you need am I missing something?
Explanation:
