Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Total is just add
n+16 is total of 16 and n
This is quite easy, but anyway:
In order, they are
3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7
7 - 3 = 4
4 would be the range
7 • 5
Multiplication is basically repeated addition. So to convert repeated addition to multiplication, we take the number being added (7) and multiply it be the number of addens (5). Therefore, 7+7+7+7+7 = 5 • 7