Answer:
A. Inductive, weak, uncogent
Explanation:
- Correcty answer is Inductive, weak, uncogent, Because the inference claim is about gastrointestinal certainty, and about probability, it is an inspiration.
- This is a weak argument because the conclusion is not true if the premise is true. It is also an irrational argument because an argument must be strong in order to be strong.
Explanation:
2. Ram and Shyam <u> </u><u>are</u><u> </u> business partners.
If this helps you then please make me brainlist
I think its 'We had it worse than everyone on the first floor,all the windows in all the upstairs rooms were tinted; and there wasn't enough moonlight in the first place.'
Answer:
They had angered God and were in danger of eternal da mnation.
Explanation:
Jonathan Edwards' sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" is a vivid descriptive sermon delivered by him in Connecticut, trying to persuade people to abstain from their wicked ways and turn to God. Giving a vivid image of the anger of God, he implores on the people to change their ways and seek salvation.
In the given passage, Edwards describes how the people had angered God and had done many despicable things which were against the very nature and belief of a Christian. Being a minister to take care of his flock, it is his job to take care of the members of his congregation. And not only that, it is also his duty to point out their mistakes and make sure that they are brought back to the "fold", back to the rightful path. He had to make sure that they are saved from the very Hell that they fear, the eternal da mnation that God had made for the sinners.
