Answer:
This type of fraud is called skimming.
Explanation:
Skimming involves taking cash from the payments made to a business before those payments are recorded in the business's accounts. By charging customers the price of two scoop ice cream cones, the cashier receives the full amount. When he decides to enter the sales as single scoop cones and takes the excess cash for himself, he 'skims' the excess cash thus committing fraud.
Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
Answer: "social proof" .
______________________________________________
Well your beliefs will make others question their's and it can create an arguement over who belief is correct.