The Crucible focuses on the inconsistencies of the Salem witch trials.
<h3>What is the story about?</h3>
It should be noted that the Crucible was written by Arthur Miller and it focuses on the inconsistencies of the Salem witch trials.
It was about the extreme behavior which can result from hidden agendas.
Learn more about the Crucible on:
brainly.com/question/26121334
#SPJ1
"Kronos was the ruler of the Titans, and he had great power and fortune. He had five children, who would eventually become the Olympians, and he is afraid of his children taking his power away from him. To prevent that, he decided to get rid of his children by taking every child and throwing them into a deep, deep well. However, his wife Rhea took them from the well and smuggled them to another town, but over time Kronos learned of their presence in another town and swallowed them whole. Luckily, Rhea was able to smuggle Zeus away safely before his father swallowed him, replacing him with a bundle of rocks. Metis, his caretaker while on the mortal world, knew about Kronos and his plot and told Zeus to pretend to serve him his food and drink, secretly poisoned by a poisoned flower. When Kronos swallowed the flower, he vomited his children out whole, who teamed together and overthrew him. Kronos's insecurity led to his demise." I edited and remade some parts to be more accurate. Some of your story was a little off so I fixed and rewrote it for you.
I have no answer I have never ever ever evr read that book srry about that just surch the web for a summery on those chapters then rephrase and you'll be good to goo
Answer:
D) I drove them, all three wailing, to the ships,
Explanation:
This line supports the idea that Odysseus cares for his men, because although it would have been much easier to leave those who ate the Lotus behind, Odysseus insisted on dragging them back to the ship with him, because he couldn't bear the thought of leaving his men behind when there is still a way to save them.
<span>Show the ambiguity and inherent questions in human beings and their morality. Because the works are so ambiguous, they make the reader question their own morality, as well as the nature of morality in general. He played off the idea of people's base desires and of doing the right thing.</span>
