The answer is C: a policy of intervention in Latin America. Hope this helps!!
Answer:
The Creeks gave up land in exchange for money and protection, but the US government did little to stop settlers from pushing west.
Explanation:
The fight for land and belonging has been a constant source of discontentment between the Native Indians and the American government. The Creeks were one such native people who, like every other Native Indian, had to suffer at the hands of the United States government and try to find peaceful ways for them to have their own reservations.
But while there are numerous wars fought between the two, there are also numerous treaties signed to try to maintain peace and cordial relations. The <u>Treaty of New York (1790), the Treaty of Fort Jackson (1814), and the Treaty of Indian Springs (1825)</u> were some of the treaties signed between the two parties. And<u> one common factor of these treaties is that the Creeks were made to cede their lands in exchange for some money and protection from the government</u>. But while the Native Indians kept their part of the agreement, the<u> U. S. Government did not do much to keep their part and did not stop the flow of settlers</u> in the areas of the Native Indians.
The reason that explains why Americans living in the western United States supported the passage of the law in this question is the
"Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 concern about competition for limited jobs."
This is based on the fact that during this period, the number of Chinese immigrants was increasing in the Western Part of the United States.
Many of these Chinese immigrants are working at a lower rate compared to a typical American and thereby reducing the number of available vacancies for the Americans.
Therefore, due to limited available jobs, many Americans living in the western United States supported the law's passage in this question.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option A. "Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 concern about competition for limited jobs."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24380381
They believed that it was unlawful to force children to attend public schooling when their parents might not want it, and saw it as an infringement of rights. Furthermore, many children were home schooled at the time, though this trend was declining, so public school wasn't seen as so much of a necessity.
