1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ddd [48]
3 years ago
15

Was president Roosevelt justified in ordering executive order 9066 which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizen

s
History
2 answers:
LiRa [457]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

here's my essay I wrote for this question on edge:

    Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066? No, he was not. All it did was result in the internment of Japanese American citizens, even though that wasn't what was specified in the order. Roosevelt was not justified in making this decision because it led to splitting up families, arresting innocent people, and denying their rights.

      The Executive Order 9066 authorized the military to keep out “any or all persons from areas of the United States designated as military areas.” However, the order did not identify any particular group, but Roosevelt used it to remove and imprison Japanese and Japanese-American citizens. It ended up condemning almost 70% of imprisoned Japanese-American Citizens. Even if they were American but had some sort of Japanese descent, they would incarcerate them. All of this was okay because of the Executive Order 9066.

      Where did these innocent citizens go when they were removed and imprisoned? They were brought into wartime camps and were suspended of their rights under Fifth Amendment. The order Roosevelt passes, allowed the suspension and so, the Japanese Americans were denied their rights. The Fifth Amendment states that 'no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process.' This is a world-wide known right. Yet, Roosevelt just takes it away because he simply feels he needs to? That's scary knowing that the president could take everybody's rights away in a second if they wanted to. Not is it only scary, but it is not justified.  

      However, many people believe that Roosevelt was under good reasoning when passing the order. Some people will argue it helped public safety. People who are on that side of this argument tend to believe that he was also justified because of the hatred and fear against the Japanese Americans after the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor. This theory continued to expand, leading to a common belief that the Japanese-Americans had been of help to the Japanese in planning the attack.  

      Despite those beliefs, Roosevelt was impartially wrong in his ordering of Executive Order 9066. While it may have been true that many Americans were fearful of the Japanese, this is not a reason of why Roosevelt was justified. This is because they did not only intern Japanese and Japanese-Americans. They also interned thousands of others including Italian and German-Americans. So, even though people were supposedly scared of the Japanese, fear was obviously not the only reason they interned innocent American citizens.

      It's understandable how, on impulse, people can believe that Roosevelt was justified in interning millions of Americans. But, if you look deeper into it, that is clearly not the case. Executive Order 9066 was an inhumane and unjustified order that ruined many Americans lives and tore apart thousands of families. So, in conclusion, Roosevelt was not justified in issuing Executive Order 9066.

hope this helps! for plagiarism reasons.. change it up a bit so that u don't get in trouble by ur teacher ahaha good luck!

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

No, I don't think so. President Roosevelt was not justified in ordering executive order 9066 which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizens. It is true that some of his cabinet members -such as the Secretary of Defense- believed that the executive order was necessary and justified. However, that order treated Japanese American people as a prisoner of war, isolated in the interim camps such as Manzanates, California, and that was not a way to treat an American citizen.

For some historians, those camps resemble in concept, the Nazi camps of World War II, taking into consideration the proportions of this comparison.

Besides, there was no real evidence that proved that these Japanese Americans were species or had ties with the Japanese Army.

You might be interested in
Why was Reconstruction needed for the former Confederacy?
yuradex [85]
<span>Reconstruction encompassed three major initiatives: restoration of the Union, transformation of southern society, and enactment of progressive legislation favoring the rights of freed slaves. </span><span>The Constitution provided no guidance on secession or readmission of states.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL BE MARKED BRAINLISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br><br> Loyalists supported the
kati45 [8]
Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often called Tories, Royalists, or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the "Patriots", who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America".
Conflict: American Revolutionary War
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many people are in USA
Hatshy [7]
<span><span>The current population of the United States of America is 325,816,150 as of today, based on the latest United Nations estimates.</span><span>The United States population is equivalent to 4.34% of the total world population, and </span><span>The U.S.A. ranks number 3 in the list of countries (and dependencies) by population.

Hope I have helped, mark as Brainliest, and have a good day!!!!
</span></span><span><span>
</span></span>
4 0
4 years ago
King John was unpopular because he refused to tax the church in England. tried to take away the rights of English nobles. allowe
Masja [62]

Answer:

tried to take away the rights of English nobles.

6 0
4 years ago
3. What civil rights movements got their starts in the 1960s and what were the goals of
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

Sit-in movement. 1960 - 1961

Freedom Rides. May 4, 1961 - September 1961

March on Washington. August 28, 1963

Civil Rights Act. 1964

Watts Riots of 1965. August 11, 1965 - August 16, 1965

Loving v. Virginia. June 12, 1967

Poor People's Campaign. June 19, 1968.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what pamphlet was used to persuade members of the Second Continental Congress and justified the ideals and reasons for independe
    9·1 answer
  • The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at tell hamoukar, syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally admini
    10·1 answer
  • What were three major medical advancements made during the civil wa?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the German War machine very productive at the beginning of WW2? What happened to make it so unleathal towards the end of
    6·1 answer
  • Why would king solomon be the better leader?
    6·1 answer
  • Jewish and Christian teachings helped contribute to the spread and development of universal education
    11·1 answer
  • Was lee defending Confederate territory ?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help
    9·1 answer
  • Although diseases were widespread in North America, colonists were less susceptible than in Europe because a. the American popul
    6·1 answer
  • How do you identify news as “fake”?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!