1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ddd [48]
3 years ago
15

Was president Roosevelt justified in ordering executive order 9066 which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizen

s
History
2 answers:
LiRa [457]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

here's my essay I wrote for this question on edge:

    Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066? No, he was not. All it did was result in the internment of Japanese American citizens, even though that wasn't what was specified in the order. Roosevelt was not justified in making this decision because it led to splitting up families, arresting innocent people, and denying their rights.

      The Executive Order 9066 authorized the military to keep out “any or all persons from areas of the United States designated as military areas.” However, the order did not identify any particular group, but Roosevelt used it to remove and imprison Japanese and Japanese-American citizens. It ended up condemning almost 70% of imprisoned Japanese-American Citizens. Even if they were American but had some sort of Japanese descent, they would incarcerate them. All of this was okay because of the Executive Order 9066.

      Where did these innocent citizens go when they were removed and imprisoned? They were brought into wartime camps and were suspended of their rights under Fifth Amendment. The order Roosevelt passes, allowed the suspension and so, the Japanese Americans were denied their rights. The Fifth Amendment states that 'no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process.' This is a world-wide known right. Yet, Roosevelt just takes it away because he simply feels he needs to? That's scary knowing that the president could take everybody's rights away in a second if they wanted to. Not is it only scary, but it is not justified.  

      However, many people believe that Roosevelt was under good reasoning when passing the order. Some people will argue it helped public safety. People who are on that side of this argument tend to believe that he was also justified because of the hatred and fear against the Japanese Americans after the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor. This theory continued to expand, leading to a common belief that the Japanese-Americans had been of help to the Japanese in planning the attack.  

      Despite those beliefs, Roosevelt was impartially wrong in his ordering of Executive Order 9066. While it may have been true that many Americans were fearful of the Japanese, this is not a reason of why Roosevelt was justified. This is because they did not only intern Japanese and Japanese-Americans. They also interned thousands of others including Italian and German-Americans. So, even though people were supposedly scared of the Japanese, fear was obviously not the only reason they interned innocent American citizens.

      It's understandable how, on impulse, people can believe that Roosevelt was justified in interning millions of Americans. But, if you look deeper into it, that is clearly not the case. Executive Order 9066 was an inhumane and unjustified order that ruined many Americans lives and tore apart thousands of families. So, in conclusion, Roosevelt was not justified in issuing Executive Order 9066.

hope this helps! for plagiarism reasons.. change it up a bit so that u don't get in trouble by ur teacher ahaha good luck!

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

No, I don't think so. President Roosevelt was not justified in ordering executive order 9066 which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizens. It is true that some of his cabinet members -such as the Secretary of Defense- believed that the executive order was necessary and justified. However, that order treated Japanese American people as a prisoner of war, isolated in the interim camps such as Manzanates, California, and that was not a way to treat an American citizen.

For some historians, those camps resemble in concept, the Nazi camps of World War II, taking into consideration the proportions of this comparison.

Besides, there was no real evidence that proved that these Japanese Americans were species or had ties with the Japanese Army.

You might be interested in
A historian's interpretation of a subject should
ki77a [65]
A historians interpretation should Never be biased.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. The basic definition of economics is illustrated by which of the following?
Alborosie

Answer:

Economics is the study of how businesses produce goods and services for an economy.

Explanation:

Economics in its most basic sense is simply the study of how goods and services are produced and how they are distributed and marketed to meet demand.

Therefore, option A is correct because Economics is the study of how businesses produce goods and services for an economy.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was 1750 -1800 an opportune moment for action for some?
xenn [34]

Answer:

Because it was a time when the United States was establishing itself as a nation. Thus, the possibility and realization of a land where it was not necessary to pay taxes to any king, was very opportune for traders from all over the world who wanted to establish a good business.

Explanation:

1750-1800 was a period of establishment of the USA, at that time the separatist movements that sought to promote the independence of the USA began, also began the moments that formed the American nation, which became a land of opportunities, since it was not necessary to pay taxes the king, nor follow strict dogmas.

In this case, the establishment of the USA as a nation has allowed many traders to settle in the country, looking to leverage their business and succeed.

4 0
3 years ago
How did the civil war affect planter families?
xxMikexx [17]
<span>Planter families were quickly decimated during the Civil War. Union blockades prevented southern plantations from exporting cotton, tobacco, indigo and other major crop they grew. Also, most of the Civil War was fought in the South, with armies often plundering planter homes for supplies, along with freeing the slaves that made up much of their wealth. At the end of the war, the southern gentry/aristocracy that planter families made up was gone.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which group of people in the United States gain the most voting rights between 1800 and 1850
valkas [14]
It used to be only white adult males with property could vote then they changed it to all white male men could vote.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The amount of money that is required for an accused person to await their trial outside of a prison cell is called __________. I
    10·2 answers
  • Immediately following world war 2 the korean peninsula
    7·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE HURRY The nation of Laos has been converted into a democracy in the 2000's.
    9·2 answers
  • Why where labor organizations blamed for the violence in Haymarket Square?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about seals and cartouches made in ancient Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley, and Egypt?
    7·2 answers
  • Will mark brainliest!! 20 points!!
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me it is very important
    7·1 answer
  • Ion kno what they be having me do but 7th grade hard but anybody know????
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an economic outcome of the Civil War and Reconstruction period?
    5·1 answer
  • Which precedents were established through the presidency of George Washington?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!