Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Because he likes chicken and candy 5x7=35
The separation of East and West Germany <span />
New Netherlands: Population
- Dutch, Germans, Scandinavians, French, African Americans (both free and enslaved), and Europeans lived in this area.
- One-fifth of New Netherland's population could be traced to African ancestry.
- Believed in equality, cooperation, and religious tolerance.
-The Dutch did partake in fights with the Natives for land and trade.
Pennsylvania: Population
- Quakers were harrassed by Anglicans and Puritans for believing in Gods "inner light".
- People were friendly towards everyone they met. Expecting the same respect in return.
- At first, many people weren't coming to the new colony. As a solution, Penn brought in different immigrants from all over western Europe to help create a profitable colony.
- Thousands of Germans brought craft and farming skills.
- The colony included traders, farmers, builders, and immigrants.
- Unlike Penn's wishes, Quakers owned slaves.
