Answer:
Speak up! ...
Power your home with renewable energy. ...
Weatherize, weatherize, weatherize. ...
Invest in energy-efficient appliances. ...
Reduce water waste. ...
Actually eat the food you buy—and make less of it meat. ...
Buy better bulbs. ...
Pull the plug(s).
In my opinion, yes, there are still groups who are disenfranchised and not considered as an equal source of power in our democracy. An example of these people is those in the lower class of the society. In today's setting, only the 'representatives' have power and those whom they represent do not. <span />
<span>Holmes dissented due to a belief that the opinion represented judicial activism, most specifically that it represented positions not held by the majority of the country. Moreover, he argued that the economic theory that was being used in the decision was not embodied in the Constitution.</span>
The right answer is the increase of agricultural output, the Ming dinasty ruled China for almost 300 years (1368-1644) and enjoyed stability and prosperity, reforming the government and making more efficient use of the land, one of the things that made this increase possible was taxes, what excludes the third option. As for the first option, Ming government persecuted to some extent Christian and Muslims communities, and for the fourth, Tokugawa was a dinastic government in Japan, not China.
