1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galina1969 [7]
2 years ago
11

Like sculptures, portraits can be created

History
1 answer:
katen-ka-za [31]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In the context of the above sentence, the term "artistic media" means: Artistic materials.

Explanation:

Artistic media is the term used to refer to different types of materials, accessories and equipment that artists can use to create their works, such as canvas, paints, photographs, marble, different types of paper, pens, among others. In this case, when the sentence states that the portrait can be created with different artistic media, it means that a portrait can be created with different artistic materials that are the choice of the artist.

You might be interested in
the dawes act encouraged native americans to settle on land with their immediate families. why do you think this was important f
xenn [34]

Answer:

The Dawes Act was introduced in 1887 by the government that took away the lands belong to the Indian Tribes.

Explanation:

The Dawes Act introduced individual plots for the Native Indians and allowed them to become part of US citizens. The Act was Anglo-American hunger for Indian lands as it opened for sale to whites. It was the disastrous pieces of Indian law ever passed by Congress. Now the question arises, were the Native Americans happy about it?  The answer is, no they were not pleased with it. The treatment towards the Native American by the American has been hostile, which led many Indians to die in raids, wars, and diseases. According to the government, it was necessary to assimilate with the American (white) culture as it gave them US citizens. Allowing the individual in allotting land helped the government to regulate laws.

3 0
3 years ago
Who was Metacomet?
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

A Wampanoag chief

Explanation:

Metacomet was an elected chief to the Wampanoag people, also known as King Philip. He was the second son of the sachem Massasoit. The Wampanoag Indians inhabited parts of coastal regions  Massachusetts and Rhode Island). He guiding the Wampanoag and other Indians to fight against the colonists in King Philip's War. King Philip's War was a conflict between indigenous inhabitants and their allies, and colonists living in New England colonists from 1675–1678.

5 0
2 years ago
How do you think n romes location in the merridean affecte4d the world of power
GrogVix [38]
He just sat back and watched. He reallt didn't do anythin, everyone else did.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the nullification crisis challenge federal authority over states?
jasenka [17]

Toward the end of his first term in office, Jackson was forced to confront the state of South Carolina on the issue of the protective tariff. Business and farming interests in the state had hoped that Jackson would use his presidential power to modify tariff laws they had long opposed. In their view, all the benefits of protection were going to Northern manufacturers, and while the country as a whole grew richer, South Carolina grew poorer, with its planters bearing the burden of higher prices.

The protective tariff passed by Congress and signed into law by Jackson in 1832 was milder than that of 1828, but it further embittered many in the state. In response, a number of South Carolina citizens endorsed the states' rights principle of "nullification," which was enunciated by John C. Calhoun, Jackson's vice president until 1832, in his South Carolina Exposition and Protest (1828). South Carolina dealt with the tariff by adopting the Ordinance of Nullification, which declared both the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within state borders. The legislature also passed laws to enforce the ordinance, including authorization for raising a military force and appropriations for arms.

Nullification was only the most recent in a series of state challenges to the authority of the federal government. There had been a continuing contest between the states and the national government over the power of the latter, and over the loyalty of the citizenry, almost since the founding of the republic. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, for example, had defied the Alien and Sedition Acts, and in the Hartford Convention, New England voiced its opposition to President Madison and the war against the British.

In response to South Carolina's threat, Jackson sent seven small naval vessels and a man-of-war to Charleston in November 1832. On December 10, he issued a resounding proclamation against the nullifiers. South Carolina, the president declared, stood on "the brink of insurrection and treason," and he appealed to the people of the state to reassert their allegiance to that Union for which their ancestors had fought.

When the question of tariff duties again came before Congress, it soon became clear that only one man, Senator Henry Clay, the great advocate of protection (and a political rival of Jackson), could pilot a compromise measure through Congress. Clay's tariff bill -- quickly passed in 1833 -- specified that all duties in excess of 20 percent of the value of the goods imported were to be reduced by easy stages, so that by 1842, the duties on all articles would reach the level of the moderate tariff of 1816.

Nullification leaders in South Carolina had expected the support of other Southern states, but without exception, the rest of the South declared South Carolina's course unwise and unconstitutional. Eventually, South Carolina rescinded its action. Both sides, nevertheless, claimed victory. Jackson had committed the federal government to the principle of Union supremacy. But South Carolina, by its show of resistance, had obtained many of the demands it sought, and had demonstrated that a single state could force its will on Congress.

5 0
3 years ago
SELECT ALL THE CORRECT ANSWERS!
lesya692 [45]

Answer:

Iroquois Confederacy are a group of native americans that sided with britain probrably because they hoped the british would aid them after the war so do the 2 and 3.

Explanation:

Good Luck! :))

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from Act I, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet
    14·1 answer
  • Complete the electron configuration for a radium atom (z = 88) in the ground state.
    5·1 answer
  • ASAP!!!!!! 11 points!
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Charles Guiteau assassinate President Garfield?
    14·1 answer
  • What mainly stood in the way of the constitutions approval
    10·2 answers
  • What were two important ways artists , including writers , responded to industrialization
    11·1 answer
  • Which teotihuacan pyramid faces the sunset on August 12
    12·1 answer
  • What was the main difference between the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks?
    6·2 answers
  • How does the US constitution protect democratic ideals?
    15·1 answer
  • Someone plz help me :(
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!