Because of the Treaty of Tordesillas, the language and background of Brazil are Portuguese
so D is the right option
hope it helps
Answer: They both saw it as new territory
Explanation: The south saw it as new and to have more slaves in while the north saw it as a land for free black slaves
Answer:
Explanation:
I tend to side with those who think civil liberties are extremely important; they are almost written in stone. They were put in the constitution to protect citizens from governments misusing their power. The government is so much more power than any one person and perhaps any one group. Moreover, they make the laws. The Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) are meant to make sure citizens at least have the opportunity to exercise those rights.
However there are times when the rights go a little to far. Numerous times since 1968, introduced various proposals that attempted to protect the rights of the American Flag. On those occasions either congress or the Supreme Court protected the individual by saying burning the flag comes under the First Amendment -- freedom of expression.
My own opinion is that many people have died defending the flag. I don't know that free speech is more powerful than the right to burn a sacred symbol. I think there are limits to free speech.
A. Alternate interior angles?
Answer:
Of course, it is fear that it stems from. For example, the west believes that, islamization of the region would draw them back to centuries and application of archaic laws based on the teachings of the Koran. Like women covering their hairs, not driving and not having their own opinion in public space.
On the other hand, the Middle East believes that, the westernization of their region would lead to them losing their culture, traditions and values which has been on the teachings of their religion and the Koran applications.
Explanation:
