In this text, Jonathan Swift employs satire to critique society in the following ways: He makes the implication that the English don't care about the Irish at all and will not object if Irish youngsters are used as food.
In response to the question, please explain how Jonathan Swift utilizes satire to critique society in this text.
As a result, we can observe that Jonathan Swift uses satire to critique society by implying that the English don't care about the Irish and would devour their children for food. This is based on the whole text.
Consequently, choice D is the appropriate response.
The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
How does Swift use satire in this passage to criticize society?
He suggests that people are foolish because they are unwilling to spend money to solve problems.
He shows that the people of Ireland would be better off listening to the English.
He suggests that people are so old-fashioned that they will not listen to new ideas.
He implies that the English care so little for the Irish people that they will not object to using Irish children for food.
To learn more about satire here:
brainly.com/question/17995154
#SPJ4
Answer:
d
Explanation:
the translator is using words in their original language and providing footnotes so that readers know what the word mean
My brother does not like the cold, yet he helped me build a snow fort.
<h2>Answer:</h2><h2>As the Civil War came to a close, southern states began to pass a series of discriminatory state laws collectively known as black codes. While the laws varied in both content and severity from state to state—some laws actually granted freed people the right to marry or testify in court— these codes were designed to maintain the social and economic structure of racial slavery in the absence of the “peculiar institution.” The laws codified white supremacy by restricting the civic participation of freed people; the codes deprived them of the right to vote, the right to serve on juries, the right to own or carry weapons, and, in some cases, even the right to rent or lease land.</h2><h2>Slavery had been a pillar of economic stability in the region before the war; now, black codes ensured the same stability by recreating the antebellum economic structure under the façade of a free-labor system. Adhering to new “apprenticeship” laws determined within the black codes, judges bound many young African American orphans to white plantation owners who would then force them to work. Adult freedmen were forced to sign contracts with their employers—who were oftentimes their previous owners. These contracts prevented African Americans from working for more than one employer, and therefore, from positively influencing the very low wages or poor working conditions they received.</h2><h2>Any former slaves that attempted to violate or evade these contracts were fined, beaten, or arrested for vagrancy. Upon arrest, many “free” African Americans were made to work for no wages, essentially being reduced to the very definition of a slave. Although slavery had been outlawed by the Thirteenth Amendment, it effectively continued in many southern states..!!</h2>
1 b 2 a 3 c 4 d 5 a 6 a 7 b 8 d 9 d 10 d
