(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
The answer would be the last one because the government had to boost economy after world war ll
New France was under direct control of the King. The people had no right to trial by jury or elect an assembly. The population grew slowly and most of the population was Catholic.
Crops include eggplant, legumes, locust bean, marama, marula, moringa, potatoes, butterfruit and grains etc. For the livestock, African production grew cattles, camels, cows, pig, chicken, sheep and other animals that contribute to the growth and balance of agricultural and ecological development.
