I perhaps view politics a bit in reverse from most people. I see it as an expression of society and the state of a culture. Not only are politics ubiquitous but one can only understand them when they see them in every day life.
<span>It's like a river. If you want to study a how a river flows, you can't scoop some water up. You have to understand several factors to why a river flows. Trying to isolate it will never reveal even that simple thing to you. If you really want to understand politics, study psychology and sociology. Study military history and especially study mass movements. </span>
<span>Only studying the specific occurrences is really just a matter of memorization, you won't ever understand politics until you realize that it being ubiquitous is a fundamental principle of politics. Don't get caught up on looking at one puzzle piece that you never realize where to put it.</span>
C. Live life full until daylight falls, as it completes the rhyme scheme. (know, ago) and (walls, falls)
It is false that reading a play rather than seeing it takes away all of its entertainment value. Both reading and seeing a play can be very entertaining, it has nothing to do with the medium.
The sentence fragments and a stanza break in lines 12-13 ("Misfit ... system”) are used to: D. Reinforce those lines descriptions of the beloved relationship to space and time.
<h3>What is sentence fragment?</h3>
A sentence fragment is actually known to be a sentence whereby the subject or its main verb is missing. Omission of words or typographical errors can be a cause of sentence fragments.
The words "Misfit...system" actually reinforces the descriptions given in the lines.
Learn more about sentence fragment on brainly.com/question/22449699
The answer would be C, "actors", because it describes the subject "we" more thoroughly, and that is actually the function of the appositive within a sentence. "Committee" is an indirect object, "we" is a subject, and "award" is a direct object.
