Answer:
Explanation:
The preparation of the production budget report in units for Pasadena Candle Inc. is shown below:
Projected sales 37,000
Add: Desired January 31 inventory 4,000
Available units 41,000
Less: Estimated January 1 inventory -$1,900
Units produced $39,100
Answer:
$15.64
Explanation:
first we must determine the market value of the bond without the warrants:
PV of face value = $1,000 / (1 + 3.5%)⁵⁰ = $179.05
PV of coupon payments = $25 x 23.45562 (PV annuity factor, 3.5%, 50 periods) = $586.39
market value = $765.44
the market value of the 15 warrants = $1,000 - $765.44 = $234.56
market value per warrant = $234.56 / 15 = $15.64
Answer:
c. Return on Assets
Explanation:
The net income usually has an impact of interest expense since interest expense is deducted from earnings before interest and tax in arriving at net income.
Hence, in order to take out the impact interest expense when computing return on assets, an adjusted net income known as de-levered net income is computed using the below formula:
Net Income + (1-t)xInterestExpense
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": investment revenue in cash.
Explanation:
Cash flows from investing activities are portrayed in the Cash Flow Statement indicating the amount o cash that was generated or spent from investment-related activities of the company. Usually, <em>cash payments to acquire physical assets, receipts from the sale of intangible assets, cash payments or receipts for the sale of bonds or shares of other companies, </em>and <em>cash payments in the form of loans</em> are considered in the cash flows from investing activities.
<em>According to the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), investment revenue in cash is reported as an inflow from operating activities.</em>
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
