Answer:
Pretend that three people who weigh the same take turns on a seesaw. No matter which two people are on the seesaw at opposite ends, they are balanced. Our government is the same way. The three that take turns riding the seesaw are:
Congress - Legislative Branch
President - Executive Branch
Supreme Court - Judicial Branch
How do these branches balance and check each other? Each branch has different powers from another branch. But each weighs the same.
President:
Makes treaties with other nations
Carries out laws
Vetoes bills Congress passes if he thinks they are wrong
Appoints judges in the Judicial Branch for a life term
Writes the budget
Congress:
Makes laws
Can override a President's veto of a bill by 2/3 vote
Can impeach a President for misconduct
Must approve presidential appointments for judges and justices
Gives the O.K. on budget spending and treaties
Can remove judges from office for misconduct
Supreme Court:
Interprets laws
May decide that some laws that Congress makes or decisions that the President make are not right according to the Constitution.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
900,500,100,300,700,1500,1100,1300
I believe the answer is: <span>Thought stopping
</span><span>Thought stopping refers to a therapy technique that is aimed to remove problematic thought that might be the source of the patient's psychological problem.
In the scenario above, this problematic thought came from the falsehood which make bella believed she would always got laughed at and causing the anxiety problem toward her</span>
The statement is True. The communication and technological revolution that promotes and enables the globalization of culture has eliminated the preservation of cultural diversity.
Cultural diversity is set appreciating that society is made of many distinct corporations with special pursuits, talents, competencies and. Wishes. It additionally means that you realize that human beings in society can have different religious ideals and sexual orientations to you.
It facilitates dispelling negative stereotypes and private biases about specific companies. Similarly, cultural diversity helps us apprehend and appreciate “approaches of being” that are not always our personal. In order as we engage with others, we will build bridges to consider, respect, and know-how across cultures.
There are generally four different types of range: inner, outside, organizational, and worldview—and also you must purpose to recognize and constitute all of them.
Learn more about cultural diversity here brainly.com/question/25671025
#SPJ4
