1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
murzikaleks [220]
3 years ago
13

How was a small country like vietnam able to win a war against the USA (1954 to 1975)​

History
1 answer:
ella [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They had help from Communist China (Viet Cong)

Explanation:

They were heavily outnumbered and were not used to the terrain. The supplies had to be shipped across the Atlantic or Pacific ocean also

You might be interested in
Under which type of government would state or provincial governments have the most sovereignty?
USPshnik [31]
It would be the totalitarian government. hope it helped.
8 0
3 years ago
Which part of the historians argument does not rely on any historical evidence?
7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

i guess it is c

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why was Rome considered a republic?
Nataly_w [17]

The Roman Republic. ... It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Centered north of Rome, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was Washington a “good” president? What precedents did he leave for future presidents?
belka [17]

Answer:

Started the following precendences:

1. Two-term limit (not an actual law until 1951)

2. A state of the union address

3. An inagural address

4. The title of "Mr. President"

Explanation:

President Washington was a humble and famous leader at the time. His actions during his eight years as President of the United States would set precedences still recognized today. All succeeding Presidents followed his example on how they were to serve.

3 0
3 years ago
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event
OLga [1]
Primary source is the firsthand experience and evidence of an event, where the any given information first appeared (initial report). The secondary source uses the first source in order to give its information (for example: document that analyzes primary source documents).
When analyzing historical event a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source because he uses the primary source as the imput information (facts, events, dates, names) in order to analyze them, connect them and explain them in his work.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who proposed the continental drift hypothesis in 1912?
    10·2 answers
  • Which factor made it more difficult for new immigrants to be assimilated into American society? (A) New immigrants largely favor
    8·2 answers
  • In the Italian city-states, each area had its own type of rule; noble families ruled Florence, the Pope ran Rome, and a doge gov
    10·2 answers
  • The sino-Soviet split was followed by an economic agreement between
    10·1 answer
  • James Watt contributed to society by ________. creating an effective steam engine pioneering research on radioactivity developin
    7·2 answers
  • How did Texas become a state.i really don't know the answer please help me i am kinda dumb right now lol
    8·2 answers
  • Which individual would feature most prominently in a discussion of how renaissance ideas spread to Northern Europe
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT TRUE of Mark Hanna?
    14·1 answer
  • Why is the zodiac killer called the zodiac killer
    8·1 answer
  • HELP, BRAINIEST PLUS 20 POINTS Y'ALL HAVE 15 MINS
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!