The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Brown paid for the escapade with his life. In the more than 160 years since that raid, John Brown has been called a hero, a madman, a martyr, and a terrorist.
a martyr is a person who is killed because of their religious or other beliefs:
a madman is a man who is mentally ill.
i thing personally that he was mentally ill and was not normal
C. It legitimized the power of the national government over states
Answer: helped spark revolutions in people who wanted democracy.
Explanation: edge 2021
i believe it was to establish the concert of europe to ensure someone like Napoleon wouldn;t ever arise to power again
