1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oxana [17]
3 years ago
6

In a few states, the lieutenant governor is NOT second in command in the state executive branch. In these states, the __________

is second in command. A. state auditor B. attorney general C. secretary of state D. superintendent of public instruction Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
History
2 answers:
elena-s [515]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I think the answer is C

Explanation:

Setler79 [48]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C. secretary of state

Explanation:

In a few states, the lieutenant governor is NOT second in command in the state executive branch. In these states, the SECRETARY OF STATE is second in command.

This is evident in places or states like Arizona, Oregon, Wyoming, and the United States territory of Puerto Rico where there is no position of Lieutenant Governor, hence, the secretary of state becomes the second in command after the Governor or directly takes command when Governor is for some reasons not available

You might be interested in
Which statement best reflects Pope Pius IX's relationship to the revolutions of 1848
alexira [117]
Pope Pius IX is considered one of the conservative type. During the revolutions of 1848, He opposed unification  , liberalism, socialism, and modern  progress , which he presume as the works of the Evil and bring bad things to the world
5 0
4 years ago
Before civil war [slavery] essay
Serjik [45]

Answer:

The pre–Civil War years (1820–1860, or the “antebellum years”) were among the most chaotic in American history—a time of significant changes that took place as the United States came of age. During these years, the nation was transformed from an underdeveloped nation of farmers and frontiersmen into an urbanized economic powerhouse. As the industrialized North and the agricultural South grew further apart, five major trends dominated American economic, social, and political life during this period.

First, the Market Revolution—the shift from an agricultural economy to one based on wages and the exchange of goods and services—completely changed the northern and western economies between 1820 and 1860. After Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin and perfected manufacturing with interchangeable parts, the North experienced a manufacturing boom that continued well into the next century. Cyrus McCormick’s mechanical mower-reaper also revolutionized grain production in the West. Internal improvements such as the Erie Canal and the Cumberland Road, combined with new modes of transportation such as the steamboat and railroad, allowed goods and crops to flow easily and cheaply between the agricultural West and manufacturing North. The growth of manufacturing also spawned the wage-labor system.

Second, American society urbanized drastically during this era. The United States had been a land comprised almost entirely of farmers, but around 1820, millions of people began to move to the cities. They, along with several million Irish and German immigrants, flooded northern cities to find jobs in the new industrial economy. The advent of the wage-labor system played a large role in transforming the social fabric because it gave birth to America’s first middle class. Comprised mostly of white-collar workers and skilled laborers, this growing middle class became the driving force behind a variety of reform movements. Among these were movements to reduce consumption of alcohol, eliminate prostitution, improve prisons and insane asylums, improve education, and ban slavery. Religious revivalism, resulting from the Second Great Awakening, also had a large impact on American life in all parts of the country.

Third, the major political struggles during the antebellum period focused on states’ rights. Southern states were dominated by “states’ righters”—those who believed that the individual states should have the final say in matters of interpreting the Constitution. Inspired by the old Democratic-Republicans, John C. Calhoun argued in his “South Carolina Exposition and Protest” essay that the states had the right to nullify laws that they deemed unconstitutional because the states themselves had created the Constitution. Others, such as President Andrew Jackson and Chief Justice John Marshall, believed that the federal government had authority over the states. The debate came to a head in the Nullification Crisis of 1832–1833, which nearly touched off a civil war.

Fourth, and closely tied to the states’ rights issue, was the debate over slavery—the most divisive issue the nation had yet faced. Between 1820 and 1860, more and more northerners came to realize the horrors and injustices of slavery, while southerners grew increasingly reliant upon it to support their cotton-based economy. Northerners did not necessarily want social and political equality for blacks; they sought merely their emancipation. The debate in politics centered primarily on the westward expansion of slavery, which southern elites saw as vital to the survival of their aristocratic social and economic order. Others vehemently opposed the expansion of slavery outside the South. The debate was critical in the Missouri crisis, the annexation of Texas, and after the Mexican War.

Finally, the issue of westward expansion itself had a profound effect on American politics and society during the antebellum years. In the wake of the War of 1812, many nationalistic Americans believed that God intended for them to spread democracy and Protestantism across the entire continent. This idea of “manifest destiny” spurred over a million Americans to sell their homes in the East and set out on treacherous Oregon, Mormon, Santa Fe, and California Trails. Policymakers capitalized on public sentiment to acquire Florida and Oregon and declared war on Mexico in 1846 to seize Texas, California, and everything in between.

Ultimately, these trends irreconcilably split the North from the South. The Market Revolution, wage labor, improved transportation, social reforms, and growing middle class of the North all clashed with the deep-seated, almost feudal social hierarchies of the South. Each successive debate on slavery and westward expansion drove the regions further apart until finally, in the 1850s, the North and the South were two wildly different places, culturally, socially, and economically.

Explanation:

This is the essay. <em>Hope This Helps!</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Prior to the Civil War, abolitionists reacted to the situation described in the poster by
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

supporting the Underground Railroad

Explanation:

The Underground Railroad was not a literal railroad but a symbolic one that stood for the secret pathways followed by slaves to escape from their masters, as well as the houses, where they stayed in the course of their flight. In that period, the American slave masters frequently lost their slaves because they wanted to run away from the hardships they experienced. An example of such a loss is the one experienced by the master in this poster.

They fled to free states, that is, states in the United States where the slave trade was not allowed, or to countries like Canada that did not permit slave trade. The abolitionists who were against the slave trade supported the movement and aided their flight with these underground railroads.

5 0
3 years ago
What is an accurate description of a serfs life?
irina [24]
<span>In the feudal system of the Medieval age, a Serf was a person who was bound to the land of his Lord. A Serf was required to service the Lord as requested. Typically, the peasant Serf would perform manual farm labor on the land and then any other duties requested by his Lord, in exchange for using part of the Lord's land to generate their own food.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Mengapakah seorang pemimpin perlu bijaksana dalam memastikan kemajuan sesebuah kerajaan atau negara?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

Mengapakah seorang pemimpin perlu bijaksana dalam memastikan kemajuan sesebuah kerajaan atau negara

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of a fungible good?
    11·2 answers
  • What was transported in the middle passage of the triangular trade?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the middle colonies relationship with the natives differ from the southern colonies
    6·1 answer
  • Who promoted the idea that by pursuing your own self-interest in a free market, you would actually be working for the common goo
    6·1 answer
  • How did northern state economies differ from southern state economies in the early to mid-1800s? Drag each description to the co
    7·1 answer
  • The Iliad and The Odyssey were written by _____.<br> Socrates<br> Plato<br> Homer<br> Aristotle
    8·2 answers
  • Artists at this time found new ways to represent a. the Church. c. reality. b. democracy. and. socialism.
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP IM TIMED What was the crusaders' goal once they took control of the Holy Land?
    11·2 answers
  • Match each of the following laws with the effect it had on Native Americans.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!