Because I see no certainty that the seceding states will ever be confederated again; none that the border states will secede at
all; and if they should, I see no reliable ground for believing that they would incorporate themselves with the Gulf or cotton states in a new government. I see no surety either that Texas would unite with them.
–“A Protest against the Ordinance of Secession,”
James G. Taliaferro
Which statement best summarizes Taliaferro's argument?
The cotton states would need a new government if they seceded.
Texas would be sure to unite against the seceded states.
There is no reason to believe that any states that seceded would unite under a confederation.
It is very unlikely that all of the border states will secede.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Locke believed in a state of nature( no government) people would be unsafe and no one would be peaceful to each other. Hobbes was the opposite of that and believed everyone would help one another and be kind.
Answer:Basham, Ashoka's personal religion became Buddhism, if not before, then certainly after the Kalinga War.
Explanation:
Answer:
The indian ocean will be under Asia and to the right of Europe and to the left of Australia
Explanation:
Answer:
c and c
Explanation:
