<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>The following is the selling and administrative expense structure of the Fazel company for the year. According to the given information and the data:</u>
The Variable selling expenses (19730000* 3%) 591900
The Fixed Expenses
The Salaries expense 960000
The Utilities expense 365000
The Office space expense 230000
The Advertising expense 1200000
The Total Fixed expense 2755000
The Total selling & admin Expense 3346900
<u>Note:</u> the variable expense is calculated by multiplying the total sales given in the question with the percentage of the commission given
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
Particulars Sell process further
sales $450,000 $1,209,000
Relevant cost
Process further cost $0 $290,000
Less: Total relevant cost $0 $290,000
Income $450,000 $629,000
Incremental income $179,000
The $1,372,000 is come from
= 5,800 units × $105 + 12,000 units × $50
= $609,000 + $600,000
= $1,209,000
Hence, the company should process further
Bob has to own his land for 18 years if the price is increasing at the rate of 6% per year.
Given that land was bought by Bob for $16390, the price is increasing at the rate of 6%, price of land today is $46817.
We are required to find the time for which Bob need to own the land so that the price of the land is $46817 today.
Compounding means calculating amount on the principal and the amount added interest.
Rate of increasing the price of land be 6%.
Price when Bob bought the land=$16390.
Price of land today=$46817.
It is like compounding of interest and the sum is calculated as under:
S=P*![(1+r)^{n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281%2Br%29%5E%7Bn%7D)
In the above equation P is theamount at beginning,r is rate of increasing and n is the number of years.
46817=16390![(1+0.06)^{n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281%2B0.06%29%5E%7Bn%7D)
46817/16390=![(1.06)^{n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281.06%29%5E%7Bn%7D)
=2.8564
=
(Approximately)
From both the sides we will get n=18.
Hence Bob has to own his land for 18 years if the price is increasing at the rate of 6% per year.
Learn more about compounding at brainly.com/question/2449900
#SPJ4
Answer: 1. A.Both firms will choose the low price.
2. B. Both firms would choose the high price.
Explanation:
1. If the firms cannot cooperate with each other and must choose simultaneously, both firms will choose the low price.
This is because at the low price both of them are at the highest profit they can make when they are not cooperating. For instance, if Firm B chooses Low Price and Firm A chooses High Price, Firm A will make $3 million while Firm be will make $8 million.
If Firm B decides to have a high price then firm A will take the low price and make $8 million in profit while Firm B makes $4 million. If they are not working together, they will both have to take the low price to make the most profit.
2. If the firms could cooperate with each other, both firms would choose the high price.
The is because they will be making more than competing and getting a lower profit. Should they cooperate they will each get $7 million in profit because they will pick the option they can both make the highest profit at. The is better than competing and making only $5 and $6 million respectively.
If you need any clarification do comment. Cheers.
Answer:
1. $54,000
2. $50,000
3. $50,000
Explanation:
1. The computation of transaction price if the expected value is used is shown below:
= Flat fee + (Cost savings × given percentage)
= $50,000 + ($20,000 × 20%)
= $50,000 + $4,000
= $54,000
2. The computation of transaction price if the estimate of variable consideration is used. So, only a flat fee should be considered and the cost saving is ignored. Hence, the amount is $50,000
3. The computation of transaction price if the estimate of variable consideration is used. So, only a flat fee should be considered and the cost saving is ignored. Hence, the amount is $50,000 as there is very uncertainty due to lack of experience