Yes, I would have supported Hamilton's economic plan. In his time, he was faced with a problem of huge national debt and so he tried to solve that by setting up a national bank and for the country to turn to more of a manufacturing and factory lifestyle than farming. I would support this because it seems that it would decrease the spending of the government and also increase the fundings of the country by turning to manufacturing, which gave quicker money.
Hope this helps.
The false statement is the following one:
<span>c. Senators vote on who should fill vacant seats within the Senate.Vacant seats are filled in during elections generally, and if a seat is vacated more suddenly, the governor of the relevant state might decide on a replacement.
The remaining statements are correct.
</span>
It helped them with trade, and also gave their army manh roads to use. They could trade and go to war with virtually anyone. They are also the first example of modern roads we see in ancient times.
If Robert McNamara is one of the options, then he is the correct answer - he was important in the Vietnam War, but not during the WWII.
Hello!
Mikhail Gorbachev was the last soviet leader. He had the control of the Soviet Union between 1985 and 1991 and started two great reforms:
The perestroika: economics measures to recover the Soviet Union. For example: reduced the investments in military and opened the market gradually.
The glasnost: the "freedom of speech" and government transparency to the people.
Hugs!
<span />
