Answer:
The main causes of WWI were nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and the system of alliances.
Explanation:
sorry, if this is wrong
Answer:
Gerrymandering (/ˈdʒɛrimændərɪŋ/,[1][2]) is a practice intended to establish an unfair political advantage for a particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries, which is most commonly used in first-past-the-post electoral systems.
Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: "cracking" (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) and "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).[3] The top-left diagram in the graphic is a form of cracking where the majority party uses its superior numbers to guarantee the minority party never attains a majority in any district.
In addition to its use achieving desired electoral results for a particular party, gerrymandering may be used to help or hinder a particular demographic, such as a political, ethnic, racial, linguistic, religious, or class group, such as in Northern Ireland where boundaries were constructed to guarantee Protestant Unionist majorities.[4] The U.S. federal voting district boundaries that produce a majority of constituents representative of African-American or other racial minorities are known as "majority-minority districts". Gerrymandering can also be used to protect incumbents. Wayne Dawkings describes it as politicians picking their voters instead of voters picking their politicians.[5]
The term gerrymandering is named after Elbridge Gerry (pronounced like "Gary"[2]), who, as Governor of Massachusetts in 1812, signed a bill that created a partisan district in the Boston area that was compared to the shape of a mythological salamander. The term has negative connotations and gerrymandering is almost always considered a corruption of the democratic process
I believe through conquest and colonization
In discussing the stockyards of Chicago, Hemingway wanted to express how conversations about war hide the killing, sadness, rot, and suffering.
We could come to this conversation because:
- Hemingway claims that the stockyards of Chicago are only concerned with presenting the meat, but they hide the slaughter and suffering of the cattle.
- Similarly, conversations about war, present only honor, duty and patriotism, but hide all the suffering and death they cause.
In this case, Hemingway presents the stockyards of Chicago to show how people romanticize and hide the real face of war. For him, this is harmful, as it encourages more wars to happen, just as the stockyards of Chicago want to encourage more meat to be consumed.
You can find more information about what Hemingway meant by citing the stockyards of Chicago at:
brainly.com/question/25766941
