Please help I have been trying to do this for a hour

History

1 answer:

Leviafan [203]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

Explanation:

But in short terms, the answer would be

A.It gave to much Power to the States

You might be interested in

Which people are eligible to be drafted? Check all that apply.

NikAS [45]

Answer:

All male citizens OLDER than 18 are eligible to be drafted

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

ASAP AND BRAINLIEST kansas and Nebraska were given popular sovereignty over slavery. What is this? Question 1 options: the right

Ratling [72]

Answer:

the right of the people to vote over slavery

Explanation:

The questions above is related to the "Kansas-Nebraska Act." It was a bill passed in 1854 that allowed the people in a territory to determine whether they will allow slavery or not in the new state's borders. This was called "popular sovereignty."

This bill was meant to organize the western territories. Although it passed the Congress, it wasn't able to achieve its purpose. This led to more factions because many people from the North opposed slavery while many people from the South supported slavery.

So, this explains the answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Which steps should you follow to revise an argumentative essay? Check all that apply.

sattari [20]

Check all of them ! you should use all them if i’m correct

6 0

2 years ago

Do you think Communism is only suited for poverty-stricken countries or for wealthy countries?

Artemon [7]

Answer:

Only poverty-stricken countries because wealthy countries have enough money to spread thru out between citizens, therefore there will be different classes. Poverty-stricken countries would use communism to try to balance out the economic resources, therefore the government owns everything so it can be spread out.

3 0

3 years ago

How do historians evaluate evidence to determine if it is reliable?

bezimeni [28]

Here is the answer. Historians evaluate evidence to determine if it is reliable by asking experts questions about the evidence. They would need the help of other experts in different fields in relation to the evidences that they have gathered. Historians are people who study the past and write about historical events. Hope this helps.

8 0

3 years ago