Answer:
third person
Explanation:
third person perspective usually uses he, she or it
Answer:
1. <u>Who made Tiresias blind?</u>
Tiresias was blind from his youth. He was perhaps the best known soothsayer from Thebes. As already stated, there are different traditions as to why he was blind.
One tradition says that he was blinded by the gods for revealing things to mankind that were for the gods alone. Another tradition states he was blinded by Athena for seeing her bathing naked. His mother prayed to Athena to restore his sight. Athena could not restore his sight, but instead gave him inner sight, or the ability to prophesy.
A final tradition states that Tiresias was walking and saw a male and female snake copulating. He struck at them killing the female serpent. For punishment he was turned into a woman. Seven years later he saw another pair of serpents and killing the male snake he was turned into a male. Having lived the life of both a woman and man, Zeus and Hera came to him in their dispute over who had more pleasure in sex. Tiresias said the woman enjoyed sex more. Outraged, Hera blinded him. Zeus rewarded Tiresias with prophecy and long life.
2. <u>Who felt guilty about it and gave Tiresias the gift of knowing everything?</u>
<u>Athena</u> didn’t give him back his sight. But to make up for the punishment, she gave him the gift of divination. She assured him that he wouldn’t lose it, even in death. Tiresias’ transsexuality. The second of the best-known versions of Tiresias’ origin says that he was walking in the fields one day when he saw two snakes mating.
Zeus, feeling sorry that Tiresias was blinded, gave him the gift of prophecy.
Zeus gave Tiresias the gift of second sight. Not surprisingly, from then on Tiresias lived the live of a reclusive ascetic - emerging only when there was a crisis in Thebes that needed his gifts.
B. He wants to communicate directly with the readers
The correct answer is C) the thesis is not restated.
<em>The statement that provides the most accurate evaluation of the paragraph is that the thesis is not restated.
</em>
The claim of the essay is that Extreme Sports should be more highly regulated because they are too dangerous. So, in the conclusion of the essay, the paragraph has to restate the thesis of the essay to consider it a good conclusion. It just refers to the Fear Factor of the extreme athletes and the risk of Extreme Sports, but the claim is not restated. It should include something like “…that is the reason why government or sports authorities nationwide should pay more attention to a higher regulation to practice Extreme Sports due to the fatal accidents in recent years...”