The classic example of this divide is how, traditionally, history curriculums approach the Civil War.
While this is less the case today, 25-50 years ago, if you grew up in the South, you would have learned about the "War of Northern Aggression"
If you grew up in the North, you would have learned about the American Civil War and the South's history of slavery and the war to end the slavery.
"Traditional" History is often written by those that were victorious, so it is remarkable to see how in the modern era voices are being heard that would not have been traditionally heard.
A global society means that history is more nuanced with more perspectives present at the table of history.
But there is still a long way to go. Californians will spend lots of time learning about Sutters Fort while Pennsylvanians will learn about Fort Duquesne.
Hello.
Historians use things such as primary soursces like fossials, Artifacts and documentary evidence. Evidence that a historian uses to study is the written record. Historians use data collected by governments to study what the world was like in regards to numbers and records.
Have a nice day
Answer:
C. Boughr the land from Russia
They migrated all over the North, Midwest, and the West, but I would say mainly the North?
