<span>Usually, for literal questions there is no one actual answer and it either can include multiple replies or no answers at all, depends on the context. Also, such question can put the listener into an awkward situation so that he would feel mixed and confused, for instance :
''why would Mr. Yallow want to ruin the system?"</span>
Answer:
He is not looking forward to talking to his father.
Explanation:
He decided against going back inside to study in order to avoid conflict with his father, although he was most likely just postponing it.
cask
a barrellike container made os wood,plastic,
avenge
inflict harm in return for(oneself or another)
preclude
prevent from happening
impunity
exemption from punish,emt or freed from consequences of the action
retribution
punishment inflicted on someone else
accost
approach and address
motley
desperate
impose
forced or to be put in place
insufferable
to extreme to bear; in tolerable
abscond
leave hurriedly and secretly
explicit
stated clearly and in detail
repose
a state of reast (sleep)
rampant
(something unwelcomed)
recess
attach (a fixture) by setting it back
imposter
a person who pretends to be someone else
i think this is right
The correct answer is - The children’s innocence touches the volunteers’ hearts.
Pathos as a rhetorical appeal should affect your emotions by using poignant themes such as the children's innocence. The other options give you facts rather than feelings, and are thus using ethos rather than pathos. By using pathos, you want to make your audience feel things and therefore agree with your points.
Chocolate was learned about when Europeans explored Africa. I do not know how did found out. I hope this answers the "when" part of the question
