The statement that is not true is: A healthy ecosystem can support an unlimited number of life forms.
Any ecosystem has its limits. No matter is a healthy, in perfect shape, and very large ecosystem, there's always a limit as to how much life forms can the ecosystem support. If the number of life forms surpasses the ability of the ecosystem to support them, than the ecosystem will crash, be destroyed, and experience a lot of changes, with the death of lot of life forms involved in the process as well.
There isn't such thing as an ecosystem that has the ability to support an infinite number of life forms, there's only ecosystems that are able to support limited number of life forms.
Answer:
its the world's longest unfortified border :))
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
During the 20th century, there was an increasing interest in the environment. The impact of human activity on the environment has been observed locally since centuries. Pollution of canals and chimneys in crowded urban areas etc were all causes of concern.
However, with a better understanding of our earth and increase in Medical knowledge of the 20th century, we could observe how our activities were having a global impact on the ozone layer and the melting ice caps.
Evidence was also provided on how human health was affected by this. The use of fossil fuels was not only directly damaging to the atmosphere, it was also dangerous for humans e.g. carbon monoxide produced by car emissions.
The reddish-orange colour of weathering of volcanic ash is most likely due to its iron sulfide content which oxidizes to iron oxide so that limonite is yellow and hematite is red and in ash since it is such fine grained material it weathers more rapidly because it has a large surface area.
Answer:
Una condición podría deberse al clima, los impuestos o los vecinos. Espero que esto haya ayudado.
Explanation:
