Answer:
This is law of effect.
Explanation:
The "law of effect" is a principle developed by "Edward Thorndike". It is the principle on behavioral conditioning, which means that if a response has a pleasing effect are likely to occur again. And if a reaction doesn’t produce satisfying effect would have less frequency in future. For example, if an employee is praised by the boss for starting his work early, it is likely that the employee’s behavior will repeat in future.
Thus, the given statement is law of effect.
Any negative value will produce this graph
Answer:
Option (D) is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
<u>The bystander effect:-
</u>
The bystander effect arises when the involvement of others disincentives a person from reacting to an actual emergency. More and more persons there's many, less and less probable it would be for one of them just to offer assistance to a troubled economy.
Other options are incorrect because they are not related to the given scenario.
Answer:
A. Selective.
Explanation:
This could be looked at in the sense of a little disorder from little Andrew, though the act is selective, it could also come up as mutuism. Some adults with selective mutism are fully capable of speech and understanding language but are physically unable to speak in certain situations, though speech is expected of them.
The behaviour may be perceived as shyness or rudeness by others. A child with selective mutism may be completely silent at school for years but speak quite freely or even excessively at home. There is a hierarchical variation among people with this disorder: some people participate fully in activities and appear social but do not speak, others will speak only to peers but not to adults, others will speak to adults when asked questions requiring short answers but never to peers, and still others speak to no one and participate in few, if any, activities presented to them.
