Basically after 9/11 it gave the government permission to “spy” on people to see if anything was a threat to national security which is why some people believe it is an invasion of privacy and against the constitution but no where in the constitution does it say anything about privacy
Answer:
Protests sometimes look like failures in the short term, but much of the power of protests is in their long-term effects, on both the protesters themselves and the rest of society.
Explanation:
The federal government supported the interests of big businesses over the interests of labor unions.
Unions became popular during the Gilded Age in the US during an industrial boom. The government supported the owners of business during this period and practiced free market capitalism.
During the Gilded Age, the government took a policy of free-market or laissez-faire capitalism. This means the government did not interfere or create regulation of the economic system. They tended to support the practices of corporations because they were wealthy and had power. Unions demanded higher wages, government regulation, and better working conditions. All of these demands went against the thinking of the time and would have cost the government money and the favor of the powerful in the country.
The two different arguments present the two different angles of the society.
Explanation:
The first angle shows the political and geographical issues that led to the fall of the Roman empire while the other shows the more human, and in a way, unknowable form of why the empire declined.
People become luxurious and peace loving in richer states because they have access to the riches. The government also faces stronger discontent because the people expect better amenities.
At the same time, an empire cannot fall if the rot is not in the government so the two reasons did work together.
