D. being tried for the same offense twice
a. is in the first amendment
b.. i don't recall
c. also dirst
The Supreme Court's decision in "Miranda v. Arizona" was based mainly on “the incorporation of due process rights in the Bill of Rights so as to make them apply to the states.”
The Miranda v. Arizona case in 1966 was a landmark case in the US justice since it considered that a prisoner has the right against self-incrimination when questioned by the police and the right of an attorney. This case is known as the “Miranda rights” since the US Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s conviction as his rights were not respected. The confession signed by Miranda when being interrogated by police was not admissible in court.
In this case, option B) is the correct one since the Miranda case is not associated with slavery, “amicus Curiae” or ex post facto laws.
Answer:
bc do jj yes we tukgdsdjk hi aa
Answer:
checks and balances fhshshsgvs hsgsgsgsvgs sjhshshsh shshhsbsbs
Explanation:
shshsbsb he dbdh
If you're referring to Napoleon's Spanish Iberian peninsula campaign between France and the coalition of Spain, Portugal and England from 1808-1814 there were three critical reasons for its failure and one main critical importance for its failure.
The three critical reasons for its failure:
1) Napoleon greatly underestimated the fierceness and will of the Spanish fighting spirit.
2) Chiefly because of reason 1) above, the vastness of the Spanish frontier and the resources required to occupy & hold territory bled his army dry.
3) Napoleon did not expect the coalition arrayed against him to hold as strongly as it did.
The main importance of its failure was that, due to Napoleon's overly ambitious tenancy to overstretch and string-out his resources, his other armies in other theaters of war were left under strengthened.
