Answer:
The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major arena of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I. It temporarily helped the Germans by freeing up troops, but this advantage did not do the Germans much good. Therefore, the revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It is the only one that makes the most logical sense. To explain, of course, the internet will continue to become more important in our lives as life goes on... option A reflects that.
The fact that internet accessibility will decrease isn't likely if we assume technology becomes more advanced and the economy continues to grow and access to tech becomes easier as it is more common.
Again, assuming the internet evolves and is improved (as is likely), Internet speed shouldn't go down as more people use the Internet.
Digital journalists may still be a thing. Regardless, this question isn't really the most directly related to tech and the gov meaning it isn't likely to be an answer.
Answer:
The code of Indian Offenses restricted the religious and cultural ceremonies of Native American tribes.
Explanation:
The major objective was cultural assimilation.
The Cheyenne were intermediaries in the commerce of horses between the tribal groups of the southern Plains and those of the north-central Plains.
Trade between tribes like Cheyenne of the Plains frequently consisted of exchanging hunting-related goods for agricultural goods like corn and squash. After the seventeenth century, European and American commodities including horses, weapons, and other metal goods were incorporated into the preexisting Plains commerce system. The Assiniboin, Hidatsa, Mandan, Arikara, and later some eastern Sioux groups mediated the trade of guns and other items like bedding, beads, fabric, and kettles that came from the British and French for pelts and buffalo robes from clusters to the west.
Learn more about Cheyenne here:
brainly.com/question/3428036
#SPJ4
The principle of Mutually Assured Destruction maintain peace between the US and USSR by the realization that both could destroy the other means nobody wants a war.
Mutual assured destruction, principle of deterrence supported on the notion that a nuclear attack by one land would be met with an awesome nuclear counterattack such each the offender and therefore the defender would be wiped out.
By the first Nineteen Fifties each the land and therefore the West were creating spectacular technological strides in what yankee futurist Woodrow Charles Herman architect known as “the motorcar era” of atomic warfare. to several Western strategists, the event of the bomb with its unbelievable killing potential spelled the top of standard ground warfare. Despite the instance of peninsula, consecutive war, they reasoned, would be fought by the nuclear giants, the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. Such a holocaust may solely be avoided by a method of philosophy, and therefore the development of a large nuclear arsenal would offer the cornerstone of U.S. Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower’s “New Look” programme.
Of the large stockpiles of weapons that the U.S. and therefore the land would proceed to accumulate, statesman magnificently quipped, “If you proceed with this nuclear race, all you're attending to do is build the debris bounce.
Learn more about Mutually Assured Destruction here: brainly.com/question/14768605
#SPJ10
