Hi there, the correct answer your looking for is:
A.
The answer is probably b or c.
<span>Usually, for literal questions there is no one actual answer and it either can include multiple replies or no answers at all, depends on the context. Also, such question can put the listener into an awkward situation so that he would feel mixed and confused, for instance :
''why would Mr. Yallow want to ruin the system?"</span>
Answer:
Green’s argument uses effective rhetoric by using these components of rhetoric to create an argument that appeals to the audience.
Green establishes ethos by stating that the Equal pay bill is being considered by the Utah legislature. This infers that he has information on the legislature, and/or could be a part of it, firming his credibility.
Then, Green uses logos by showing you how the turn of events will happen if the Equal pay bill is accepted and enforced: “if businesses are forced to pay women the same as male earnings, that means they will have to reduce the pay for the men they employ". "If that happens, then men will have an even more difficult time earning enough to support their families”.
Finally, Green wraps it up by using pathos: “We should encourage our legislators to drop the whole notion. Let the marketplace determine what free-market forces should prevail. It is not the role of the government to dictate to businesses what they should pay anyway, either as a Minimum Wage or Equal pay for men and women.
Explanation:
Give the brainliest
