"I was thinking of uninstalling this application for a certain period of time or maybe I'm not going to be using it anymore".
<span>Since you're only allowed to see what one character is thinking or doing, then the answer should be B. third-person limited. If it was omniscient you would know everything and if it was a first person one, then you would not even see the narrator but rather the character would be the narrator. </span>
Answer:
He wants to fight the creature out of her sight
Explanation:
She served sandwiches to the children in their plates
Hello. You forgot to show the text to which this question refers. The text is:
An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential, contrary to the common-sense “intuitive linear” view. So we won’t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century — it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today’s rate). The “returns,” such as chip speed and cost-effectiveness, also increase exponentially. There’s even exponential growth in the rate of exponential growth. Within a few decades, machine intelligence will surpass human intelligence, leading to The Singularity — technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history. The implications include the merger of biological and nonbiological intelligence, immortal software-based humans, and ultra-high levels of intelligence that expand outward in the universe at the speed of light.
Answer and Explanation:
The text shows that the exponential growth of the technology, will promote a great advance in the economy and in the devices that we use today. This will allow us to experience a strong technological change that will occur faster than social advancement. To present these ideas, the text presents us with a structure of cause and effect showing what the constant and rapid movement of technology is capable of causing.