The correct answer to this question is "c. he demonstrated religious tolerance while other leaders did not." At the end of the reformation, the king of England compare with the kings of other European nations is that <span>he demonstrated religious tolerance while other leaders did not.</span>
I think Lord Acton would most likely agree with the statement: "<span>A federation would be best because it balances power between the state and federal governments.</span>" This is because in this set-up, the power belongs not only to a selected few but to several people. This is unlike the other statements which suggest forms of government that leave the power only to a few people which is close to gaining absolute power.
Yes it was illegal. It was considered a violation of the amendments and that's why war was necessary to make people agree on something for once. The Confederate States made their own amendments once they seceded but technically, they never actually left the north so those new amendments were considered null and void.
It was the "(1) location on waterways" that was a geographic factor that enabled the cities of <span>Nanjing and Mogadishu to develop into powerful trading centers.</span>
British taxation on the colonies without proper representation in Parliament
