The paraphrasing mistake that Ania makes is a. She does not restate the ideas in her own words.
<h3>What is paraphrasing?</h3>
Paraphrasing connotes the restatement of a text or passage using different words from the author's.
While the meaning or idea of the paraphrased passage should be retained, the paraphrased expression should employ different words.
<h3>What are some paraphrasing mistakes?</h3>
Some of the paraphrasing mistakes that some writers make include:
- Rearranging the word order
- Changing the verb tenses
- Using synonyms to replace some words
- Using passive voices instead of active voices
- Failure to acknowledge the source of the original text.
Thus, the paraphrasing mistake that Ania makes is a. She does not restate the ideas in her own words.
Learn more about paraphrasing and paraphrasing mistakes at brainly.com/question/5032491 and brainly.com/question/27922122
#SPJ1
The correct answer is: “That God has taken his sight, but has returned Jane to him”. Here is the book's quote:
"And there is enchantment in the very hour I am now spending with you. Who can tell what a dark, dreary, hopeless life I have dragged on for months past? Doing nothing, expecting nothing; merging night in day; feeling but the sensation of cold when I let the fire go out, of hunger when I forgot to eat: and then a ceaseless sorrow, and, at times, a very delirium of desire to behold my Jane again. Yes: for her restoration I longed, far more than for that of my lost sight. How can it be that Jane is with me, and says she loves me? Will she not depart as suddenly as she came? Tomorrow, I fear I shall find her no more."
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>These passages differ in their ideas about the Magnusson fishery and conservation act in the sense that the first author warns that the act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict. (D)</em>
<em />
<u>Explanation:</u>
Both the authors have given different perspectives and shared distinct opinions on the Magnusson act. There are different facts and figures which have been put forward by both the writers supporting respective opinions. The later considers this act and its regulations may affect fisheries and its overall supply while the former considers this act as an insufficient one.
My teacher says the answer is a
