1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
3 years ago
15

The compromise of 1877 brought an end to radical reconstruction by providing for the A. resignation of president rutherford B.re

moval of federal troops from southern states C. establishment of sharecropping D. strict enforcement of 14th amendment
History
1 answer:
baherus [9]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The Compromise of 1877 brought an end to radical reconstruction by providing for the removal of Federal troops from southern states.

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1877 was an informal pact reached in the United States after the disputed presidential elections of 1876 between the republican Rutherford B. Hayes and the democrat Samuel J. Tilden. According to the "compromise", and after several controversies among the polling stations on the results of the elections, it was agreed to grant the presidency to Hayes, in exchange for his regime accepting certain demands of the Democratic Party led by Tilden; among them, removing Federal troops from the South.

You might be interested in
According to Karl Marx, who were the bourgeoisie?
Ivanshal [37]
C. The Upper Class

In other words, those with money and controlling production. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(apex)
BigorU [14]
<span>the correct answer is A
</span><span>a) people from both classes suffered because of polluted air and water supplies.
</span>
Coal was the source of energy for Britain factories. Coal, an extreme pollutant made Britain to be renowned for black satanic mills. Air, and water sources were polluted during the era, with environmentalist predicting that over a third of the deaths that time were related to the pollution effects.
<span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cracking down on dissent during World War I was part of what larger governmental goal in the United States?seizing absolute powe
madam [21]

The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.

Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.  

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Frederick Douglass argued that by holding slaves responsible for their actions, Virginia laws recognized them as moral, intellec
ExtremeBDS [4]
The answer to your question is true <span />
7 0
3 years ago
"most scholars agree that the ______ (literally "rebirth" in french) was a time of transition from medieval to modern times."
Lunna [17]
The phrase <span>Renaissance fills in that blank.  Please mark Brainliest!!!</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was a Buddhist monk who took a 17 year journey to holy sites to learn more about Buddhism?
    10·1 answer
  • 2. the reasons for South Korea's economic success and recent downturn.
    13·1 answer
  • What is the significance of kantorek calling his former students the "iron youth"?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help fast
    12·1 answer
  • When historians talk about the present, they are referring to events
    13·2 answers
  • What are some factors that caused European nations and the United States to become involved in world war 1?
    11·1 answer
  • Which accurately describes origins and outcomes of Latin America’s fight for independence during the 19th century?
    6·1 answer
  • Can i please have 3 examples of Gravity?
    13·2 answers
  • What 2 countries were at an advantage during ww1​
    8·2 answers
  • Which position did Abraham Lincoln take regarding enslavement?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!