1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreyy89
2 years ago
9

Where are you likey to experience more rain?

History
1 answer:
ladessa [460]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The largest increases in heavy precipitation events on land are expected to occur over central Africa and South Asia

You might be interested in
Toward the end of the nineteenth century, some American policians and diplomats believe that the United States should become and
nlexa [21]
At this time colonies were viewed as a major factor in determining a nations power internationally and also an engine for economic growth in a mercantilist system. Therefore, arguments in favor of U.S. Imperialism would have been fueled by the power struggle with European nations to exert global influence and dominance. Another major factor that individuals would have argued for was that colonies would have provided new markets and sources for raw materials for the growing US economy. In the end the U.S. did not become a major imperial power which most likely served the nation's power and reputation in the long run. 

5 0
3 years ago
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
What are the connections between the effects of tyranny and slavery? (1780)
MariettaO [177]
Effects of Tyranny:

1.) It hurts the People.
2.) It inflicts pain and suffering upon the lives of the People
3.) the People have to deal with the chaos and uncertainty that comes
4.) have to live with tyranny that can do what it wants when it wants
5.) the People do not matter at all
6.) they have pain caused by tyranny's actions

Effects of Slavery:

1.) Family seperation
2.) Inhibited family formation
3.) Made unstable, insecure family life
3.) Slaves were considered property
4.) Brought unique constrictions, disruptions, frustrations, and pain
5.) Unpaid labor
6.) Possibility of Abuse

The connections between these effects of tyranny and slavery is that they are unfair and go against the possibility of "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness".

8 0
3 years ago
I need the answer as soon as possible
vladimir2022 [97]

6. Evacuate Americans if necessary.

7. Spain.

8. Cuba.

9. Guam.

10. Protectorate.

3 0
3 years ago
How does the constitution most reflect the beliefs of federalists
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I had dis question before

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do you think somr americans feared the new morality
    10·1 answer
  • This small country in Southern Africa is completely surrounded by South Africa.
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Which group of people did the Romans view as a threat to the empire?
    5·2 answers
  • what were the intolerable acts? how did the colonists in Massachusetts and throughout the colonies respond to them?
    13·1 answer
  • A small group of socially and economically elite citizens that rules a country or other political unit.​
    11·1 answer
  • How did the raising of U.S. tariffs make the worldwide depression worse?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What did the United States implement that angered the Japanese and led to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
    5·2 answers
  • The chart below list three important civil rights leaders:
    12·2 answers
  • -What are some of the different viewpoints on the incidents or stories that led people to settle in Maldives?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!