1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
4 years ago
15

What was Britain's primary goal in building an empire?

History
1 answer:
tekilochka [14]4 years ago
7 0

With respect to its colonies, British mercantilism meant that the government and the merchants became partners with the goal of increasing political power and private wealth, to the exclusion of other empires.

You might be interested in
Who held the most power in the greek family?
Wittaler [7]
As for the majority of ancient societies, men were the ones who held the most power in the family. Their was the last say and they could decide what would be done. However, families who had slaves had women commanding them. The wives were the ones who took control of slaves in the house. 
6 0
3 years ago
You are a Roman living about 650
AnnyKZ [126]
"do not fear my friends"! "new rulers is new change"! but change does not all ways mean bad! for change is the solution! turning to the fate is like turning against your self. understand this my friends i to fear this! but...(take over from here for this should get you started)
3 0
3 years ago
Why is history open to ongoing and changing interpretations
Darina [25.2K]
Because History has many secrets and everyday historians are finding out more about history than we could have ever imagined. plus history is always changing so there is always gonna be something new thatsomeone could learn from history
7 0
4 years ago
How many Americans died in the raid on Columbus, NM? a. 0 c. 19 b. 5 d. 90
sammy [17]

Answer: 19 Americans died 90 Mexicans died

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What it Abraham Lincoln had not been killed by John Wilkes Booth? How would
stira [4]

Answer:

If President Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, I believe that Reconstruction and the post-war era would have been more historically positive and ambitious. I think Lincoln would have achieved more things politically and socially for America, and would have done more to fight against many injustices in this country. Andrew Johnson did not have a positive presidency, says his impeachment. Lincoln had plans, but Andrew Johnson created policies and actions that went against the Republican Party and angered many, like his pardoning of Southerners. Lincoln would have continued to be a great figure for his party and I believe would have provided more as leadership than Johnson. If he was not assassinated, I believe that Lincoln would have continued his legacy and his fight for justice in America.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does your textbook say about eye contact for public speakers who address audiences in the united states?
    14·1 answer
  • How many native people were there in the present day of united states?
    6·2 answers
  • Which explains why Supreme Court justices are given lifetime appointments?
    10·2 answers
  • Which factor was most important to the United States’ purchase of Alaska? national defense
    9·1 answer
  • Why would companies have wanted to bust unions?
    7·2 answers
  • Which Enlightenment philosopher is most closely associated with the idea that governments have the responsibility to guard life,
    6·2 answers
  • What does Albert think he can hear in his mom's office
    13·1 answer
  • How does this interaction between Nora and the nurse affect the plot?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
    10·2 answers
  • Civil liberties are related to which kind of fundamental rights?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!