This question is missing the paragraph we must read to answer it. I've found it online, and it is as follows:
Levine and Kearney see the study as a clear lesson in the value of a (very cheap) mass-media complement to preschool. The potentially controversial implication they embrace from the study isn't about childhood education. It's about college, and the trend toward low-cost massive open online courses, or MOOCs.
Answer:
The word that gives the best definition for complete as it is used in paragraph 11 of "Study: Kids can learn as much from 'Sesame Street' as from preschool?" is:
B. to complete or make whole.
Explanation:
The verb "to complement" can refer to the action of completing something or to the action of enhancing something. After reading the paragraph, it is clear the author is talking of the possibility of completing education as we know it. Using mass media is a cheap way to give thousands of people access to education, complementing or completing what is already commonly offered. Having that in mind, the best option to answer this question is letter B. to complete or to make whole.
Answer:
Police Brutality, I think to much people get killed from this and it can be solved!
Answer:
Dear Sam,
Mrs. Anna's class and I were going to the local zoo when something unusual happened. We had just gotten done eating some food at the café and some girls wanted to go look at the dusk monkeys. Anyways, we're all looking at monkeys when we see a tiger. Well, yes its a zoo you see animals all the time. But this Bengal tiger was out of its cage. It also had a chicken in its mouth. This Bengal Tiger was also loose. Everyone in the class including Mrs. Anna started freaking out because they thought the tiger was going to eat them too or something. A few minutes later, zoo keepers came by and shot the tiger with a tranquillizer and hauled it back to its cage. Apparently a section of the cage had a space big enough for Cassie the tiger to get out. We're all safe now!
Can't wait to see you soon, ___
Explanation:
is there any choices so I can figure it out
Answer:
Explanation:
Everyone probably doesn’t feel the same way as I do, but perhaps they should. While being in nature leads to better health, creativity, and even kindness, there may be something special about being among trees.
After all, trees are important to our lives in many ways. The most obvious is their role in producing the oxygen we breathe and sequestering carbon dioxide to help protect our atmosphere; but science suggests trees provide other important benefits, too.
Here are some of the more provocative findings from recent research on how trees increase human well-being.
Trees help us feel less stressed and more restored
Probably the most well-researched benefit of nature exposure is that it seems to help decrease our stress, rumination, and anxiety. And much of that research has been conducted in forests.
In one recent study, 585 young adult Japanese participants reported on their moods after walking for 15 minutes, either in an urban setting or in a forest. The forests and urban centers were in 52 different locations around the country, and about a dozen participants walked in each area. In all cases, the participants walking in a forest experienced less anxiety, hostility, fatigue, confusion, and depressive symptoms, and more vigor, compared to walking in an urban setting. The results were even stronger for people who were more anxious to begin with.
